🚀 go-pugleaf

"Elmo" <DoNoSpam@NoSpam.org> wrote in message 
news:dl286u$1iim$1@f04n12.cac.psu.edu...
> D. A. Tsenuf wrote:
>> "max" <betatron@earthink.net> wrote in message 
>> news:dl1hah$697$1@ftupet.ftupet.com...
>>
>>>In article <v7md43-vtq.ln1@remote.clifto.com>,
>>>clifto <clifto@clifto.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Brent P wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <1131590533.936614.86460@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, 
>>>>>Nexus7
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Brent P wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In article <1131050104.337390.53060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, 
>>>>>>>Nexus7
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Every day their numbers are growing. The mechanization of America is
>>>>>>>>inevitable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>As time goes on, you sound more and more like Rush Limbaugh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As usual, you've missed the point entirely. Hint: Check the spelling.
>>>>>
>>>>>I got the point exactly. Sounds like a comparison limbaugh would make.
>>>>
>>>>Fear Limbaugh. He demonstrates the stupidity of liberals in language
>>>>even liberals can understand.
>>>
>>>what does america's truth detector say about the talibanization of
>>>science in kansas?
>>>
>>
>>
>> What talibanzation of science in Kansas ?
>> As an Agnostic who studied theology under Jesuits and Calvinists. I can't 
>> help but laugh at the blatant ignorance of the so-called protectors of 
>> the "scientific method". A process that they clearly do NOT understand...
>> You should read Darwin
>> You will find that Darwin himself believed in "intelligent design"
>
> Garbage!
>
>> This is not a battel about evolution
>> It is a battle of secularists trying to eradicate the possibility that 
>> God may exist
>
> God's existance -- or the lack thereof -- is not an issue that can be 
> settled
> by scientific methods.  Nor is it in the realm of Biology.
>

LOL.
You have a right to believe in totally random, chaotic eolution
    But it's just a theory
People who believe that there may be intelligent design involved have a 
right to believe that.
    After all, it's just another theory
Anyone from either camp claiming that their pet theory is better than the 
other one, is an idiot who is clueless about the scientific method.
And do you know why, because either theory explains the existence of the 
universe just as well as the other with the data available.
Now a TRUE scientist would NOT pick camps in such a situation. Instead a 
TRUE scientist will recognize that withthe data available both theories 
stand on the same footing.
Anyone one claiming otherwise, from either camp is confusing belief with 
theory supported by data.
Anyone who claims that one belief is better than the other without 
supporting data is just prononcing themselves on their own religious 
beliefs.
And if you look at the supporters of either camp, they are both behaving 
like intolerant religious fanatics indistiguishiblwe from each other EXCEPT 
for the side of the coin they have chosen.



> By the same token, biology has nothing to tell us about ethics or God.
>

Only idiots like you would try such a thing

>
>> That it is fought on "science" does not make it less a religious war by 
>> the secularists.
>>