🚀 go-pugleaf

"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:SaqdnTR9r9MxKunenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> In article <11n95v5sdvhoc25@corp.supernews.com>, D. A. Tsenuf wrote:
>>> what does america's truth detector say about the talibanization of
>>> science in kansas?
>
>> What talibanzation of science in Kansas ?
>> As an Agnostic who studied theology under Jesuits and Calvinists. I can't
>> help but laugh at the blatant ignorance of the so-called protectors of 
>> the
>> "scientific method". A process that they clearly do NOT understand...
>> You should read Darwin
>> You will find that Darwin himself believed in "intelligent design"
>> This is not a battel about evolution
>> It is a battle of secularists trying to eradicate the possibility that 
>> God
>> may exist
>> That it is fought on "science" does not make it less a religious war by 
>> the
>> secularists.
>
>
> "Science" also has become a religion in the way it functions. Much of
> "science" as I have found is conjecture based upon facts. If someone has
> a theory that is different but supported by the same facts, he will be
> ridiculed etc etc as non-scientific or a kook because he does not agree
> with the accepted theory. Existing accepted theories become as entrenched
> as any belief system can be. Even when alternatives come about with
> considerably more facts to support them, better explain the existing
> facts, the entrenched theory will remain for some time.
>
> Those in science often work to surpress and destroy evidence that would
> lead towards different theories.
>
> Keep in mind I am making very general statements, not just on the
> particular topic of ID vs. E.
>
>

Agreed
The behavor is the same EXCEPT for what their pet belief is.