🚀 go-pugleaf

"The Watcher" <don'tgo@there.com> wrote in message 
news:43758236.2152813@news.ritternet.com...
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:52:57 -0800, Don Homuth <dhomuth1@comcast.net> 
> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:45:42 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@Tsenuf.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:SaqdnTd9r9NtKunenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> In article <dl286u$1iim$1@f04n12.cac.psu.edu>, Elmo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> God's existance -- or the lack thereof -- is not an issue that can be
>>>>> settled
>>>>> by scientific methods.  Nor is it in the realm of Biology.
>>>>
>>>> Why not?  Who knows, maybe there is a signature in the 'junk' DNA. :)
>>>>
>>>Yes, but since the secularists BELIEVE that there is no god, in what way 
>>>is
>>>their "religious" fervor and zeal any different from those who believe 
>>>there
>>>there is a God ?
>>
>>So long as it is a mere Belief on either side, what cause to demand
>>that one be superior to the other?
>>
>>>Frankly, except for the side of the coin they espouse, I can't tell them
>>>apart in every other aspect of their behavior.
>>
>>Religionists believe there Is a god.  Or gods.
>>
>>Atheists believe there is/are Not.
>
> They do? Who told you that? I'm an atheist and I don't believe that.

Then you don't know the meaining of the word "Atheist".



>>
>>Agnostics leave the matter open, thereby hedging their bets.
>>
>>Reasonable folks have figured out that it doesn't really matter
>>whether there is or is not.  It makes no difference which stance you
>>take, in any Real World way.
>

LOL
And you have proof of this ?