🚀 go-pugleaf

"The Watcher" <don'tgo@there.com> wrote in message 
news:43758289.2235489@news.ritternet.com...
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:06:40 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@Tsenuf.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"max" <betatron@earthink.net> wrote in message
>>news:dl1hah$697$1@ftupet.ftupet.com...
>>> In article <v7md43-vtq.ln1@remote.clifto.com>,
>>> clifto <clifto@clifto.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Brent P wrote:
>>>> > In article <1131590533.936614.86460@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> > Nexus7
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >> Brent P wrote:
>>>> >>> In article <1131050104.337390.53060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> >>> Nexus7
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>> > Every day their numbers are growing. The mechanization of America
>>>> >>> > is
>>>> >>> > inevitable.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> As time goes on, you sound more and more like Rush Limbaugh.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> As usual, you've missed the point entirely. Hint: Check the 
>>>> >> spelling.
>>>> >
>>>> > I got the point exactly. Sounds like a comparison limbaugh would 
>>>> > make.
>>>>
>>>> Fear Limbaugh. He demonstrates the stupidity of liberals in language
>>>> even liberals can understand.
>>>
>>> what does america's truth detector say about the talibanization of
>>> science in kansas?
>>>
>>
>>What talibanzation of science in Kansas ?
>>As an Agnostic who studied theology under Jesuits and Calvinists. I can't
>>help but laugh at the blatant ignorance of the so-called protectors of the
>>"scientific method". A process that they clearly do NOT understand...
>>You should read Darwin
>>You will find that Darwin himself believed in "intelligent design"
>
> That's called an Appeal to Authority, and it's a logical fallacy. It's
> irrelevant, since it doesn't matter what PRIVATE religious beliefs Darwin 
> held.
> Darwin was no more an expert on that subject than anybody else, so his 
> opinion
> counts for no more "points" than yours or mine. ;)
>
>>This is not a battel about evolution
>>It is a battle of secularists trying to eradicate the possibility that God
>>may exist
>
> Nope. It's a battle about what is taught in SCIENCE class. If they teach
> religion in science class, they're wrong.
>

Since you can't tell the difference, you're in no position to pass any 
judgement.