Article View: ne.general
Article #2577Re: A question to think about......
From: a_jabberwock
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00
117 lines
5712 bytes
5712 bytes
In article <36637634.9D310230@earthlink.net>, Chris <lightpony@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > a_jabberwock@hotmail.com wrote: > > > > In article <366228CA.5FBCB89B@earthlink.net>, > > Chris <lightpony@earthlink.net> wrote: > > That's what you consider a statistic? > > Just a fact - is that not statistically accurate? But not a statistic, You can research the latest projections of the Bureau of the Census on the web, and find the worst countries for overpopulation are not Catholic, they are India, most of Asia, and parts of Africa. BHut you knew that, you just want to blame the Pope for something, to pump yourself up, don't you, Chris? > > > > And your proof that overpopulation is bad for the world? > > > > > > Er...our current environment? > > > > My current enviroment seems great, so what is your proof? > > Well we're at 6 bil planetary pop. now - projections are for 10 bil in > our lifespan...should we see it. In our lifespan? Is that our two total lifespans added, or what? And we are not 6billion, we are an estimated 5,951,297,626, but the numbers mean nothing without knowing the largest stable population the Earth will support with proper managment. My guess is 50 billion. > > > > Thats why India has no overpopulation or misery, no Catholics? > > > > > > No common sense - cow worship is best left to cattlemen... > > > > Yes, thats great. What about Africa and Asia? > > Sure clitorodectomy, fattening women for marriage, male domination, > trading daughters for cows and such...nah..no problem there... But none of it caused by Catholics, Chris. Try to stay on topic. > > Who, you? You are a hard core liberal, aren't you Chris? > > Er, sorry..nope...I'm a capitalist stock picking machine. Yes, a hard core Liberal one. Or is it against the code of Liberals to own stock? > If my diversity of policy endorsements confuses you Your opinions amuse me more than confuse me, Chris. > You may have felt at a loss due to your inability to equate human > ecosystems to animal ones. Don't worry. A basic course in urban ecology, > buffered with some biology and meteorology will get you there. It's all > wave theory and food chain. Once you understand survival, greed( a > component thereof), and random numbers you'll be fine! I'm fine right now, Chris, and so is Colorado. We're living high on the hog. So where does Catholicism fit in to your ecosystem model, and why is its impact on population and development not as bad as non Catholic ones? > > > Actually what is up for grabs is the papal decrees against birth control > > > (how smart is that as we careen to 10 bil pop on the globe?) > > > > Actually, the only 100% sure method of birth control is OK with the Pope, is > > it not? > And most provably unpracticable - eh? It's very practical, just not practiced, especially in less developed countries where people have nothing. > > Ah, yes. You like to blame people for the sins of the past, tell me, Chris, > > what is your past? > > I dunno - some good, some bad, and a lot of learning. I keep trying, > keep reading...you? Mostly the same, only I am looking past my own prejudices. You? > > > I'm all for prayer in the home or church - just keep it > > > there. > > > > So you are against free speech? You must be a liberal. > > No I'm a centrist on domestic issues, a radical on personal liberties, > and a conglommerist when it comes to group think... But how can you really mean it when you would limit free speech of a religious nature? You are just like the Church was hundreds of years ago, ready to limit the rights of those you don't agree with, hardly what I would call a "radical on personal liberties". > > > You lot scare me when you organize for more than a picnic - even then > > > the potato salad may be toxic! > > > > Me lot? What are you talking about? I'm not Catholic, Chris. > > Religious right'ers in general - born agains, Morons, Cat-lckers, > Baptists, etc. Being a radical on personal liberties again? > Shiny happy people having fun - their fun only please! > > Didn't mean to imply you were any one of the above or others not listed > - just a general thought about religions at large. Everybody has a religion, even if it is agnostic. What is your religion, Chris? -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<741410$jj2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<365D5904.FD059FD3@nh.ultranet.com> <365d7c4d.4553894@vnntp.ma.ultranet.com> <365ddc4d.0@news.mho.net> <F327DK.n02@world.std.com> <365f3e6c.0@news.mho.net> <73om1i$gob@enews1.newsguy.com> <36604a96.0@news.mho.net> <73t2qi$8g2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <366228CA.5FBCB89B@earthlink.net> <73ue83$b65$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36637634.9D310230@earthlink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101eb4,52806a22d8c9be3e X-Google-Attributes: gid101eb4,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,52806a22d8c9be3e X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,52806a22d8c9be3e X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,52806a22d8c9be3e X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public From: a_jabberwock@hotmail.com Subject: Re: A question to think about...... Date: 1998/12/01 Message-ID: <741410$jj2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Deja-AN: 417483145 References: <365D5904.FD059FD3@nh.ultranet.com> <365d7c4d.4553894@vnntp.ma.ultranet.com> <365ddc4d.0@news.mho.net> <F327DK.n02@world.std.com> <365f3e6c.0@news.mho.net> <73om1i$gob@enews1.newsguy.com> <36604a96.0@news.mho.net> <73t2qi$8g2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <366228CA.5FBCB89B@earthlink.net> <73ue83$b65$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36637634.9D310230@earthlink.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x13.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 129.46.12.131 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Dec 01 16:03:57 1998 GMT Newsgroups: ne.general,dc.general,fl.general,co.general X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (Win95; U)