🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 20 Sep 1998 10:34:22 -0700, Robert Winters
<rwinters@math.harvard.edu> wrote:

>"Wizard" wrote:
>> He "lost his draft card" / proven to be an outright LIE
>> He smoked Refer but "didn't inhale" / accepted as being a moronic LIE
>> He lied about Jennifer Flowers ...
>> He has lied about auctioning off "weekend get-aways" in the White House
>> He lied about Whitewater
>> He lied about Lewinsky
>> His defense about Lewinsky is more lies and his public head hanging is
>> simply more lies.
>> 
>> He should take his own advice when he public stated something to the
>> effect that " Nixon has lied to the public and should resign"!
>> 
>> .. and you should learn to keep you nose out of america's affairs.
>
>He's my guest. Deal with it.
>
>Regarding your parade of lies, can you please explain how any one of
>them has any effect on the affairs of state? 
>
>Does Clinton's draft card affect foreign policy? 

Of course it does. As it would in a board room in that it reveals
his weakness of character: he was neither honestly defiant, nor
"conscientious " but rather chose to avoid ANY personal
consequences to which he might have been held accountable. (I'll
grant you that in certain board rooms that feat would be worthy
of admiration.) Its unfair to speculate further since his number
never came up due to his successful manipulation of the local
draft board. Would he have hopped a bus to Montreal or submitted
to induction? If inducted would he have survived basic training?
Who knows? Foreign adversaries sizing him up would certainly toy
with the possibilities in profiling the man.

>Does his evasion on smoking marijuana have any effect on whether or 
>   not he'll veto the tax cuts?

Don't ask, don't tell.

>Is Gennifer Flowers on the verge of being named an ambassador?

Arkansas has ambassadors? Any way, if she had played her cards
right she might have had a job at the Pentagon.

>Would your staying at the White House affect relations with the Russian
>   government?

Why should it? According to Aldritch they could have had open
access to the Whitehouse. Apparently the Chinese did.

>Are the alleged financial misdealings in the Whitewater case the cause
>   of major swings in the stock market.

Good question. For sure a few jailhouse cell-gates have swung in
the aftermath.

>Does the quantity or quality of a Lewinsky blow job have a significant
>   effect on education policies?

You mean at Agassiz? I think that was before the Lewinsky epoch
in American history.

>Richard Nixon authorized political espionage. If you want to accuse 
>   Clinton of something of that magnitude, then the lines are open. 

No. You're right. Clinton is reputed to have far exceeded
commonplace "political espionage" as we know it. Perjury, and
obstruction of justice, are crimes of which the President himself
is accused. He is not implicated by virtue of some responsibility
he may have had for the actions of others, but for his own acts,
an higher order of magnitude altogether.

>   Until then, next caller.

I think the US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee is on
the line.

Will you accept the charges?