🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 20 Dec 1995, John Cooley wrote:

> -=Weezel=-  <louise@mv.mv.com> wrote:
> >....

(well, we don't need to read it THREE times)

> 
> Weezel, my using a guy's non-PC term like "hunting babes" has drawn out
> all the lunies!  Everyone seems to have focused on the "hunting" and "babes"
> words while completely deleting or ignoring all my references to all the
> *emotions* involved like laughing, crying, hoping, sharing worries with
> friends, wondering what she'll think -- you know -- all sorts of non-violent,
> non-women-as-objects type language.  Thanks for offering this interpretation
> (as one of three possible) in your reply.  

Yah, I thought you might also have this side. Most people do, unless 
they're psychotic or very unhappy/bitter. 

You gotta admit, the "hunting babes" thing was flame-bait, intended or 
not. 

I'm used to seeing various sides (and shades of grey) in things - it's my 
job to be able to stand in all sorts of shoes (I'm a sw tech writer, used 
to be a coder, currently writing compiler manuals, yah, a geek, but also 
an artist etc. MPS means you can do it all... and with a friend. *grin*) 
And I've dealt with many guys who come across as hunting etc. They calm 
right down once the collar and cuffs lock.

--Louise, who is smiling with complete innocence

(and for everyone who's either interested or disgusted at this point... 
LAUGH A LITTLE WILL YA????!!!)