Article View: net.lan
Article #48Re: More on Fiber Enet Rptrs
From: Brian Lloyd
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1985 18:26
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1985 18:26
20 lines
1470 bytes
1470 bytes
> [...] yet it is TEMPEST > certified. This leads to an interesting paradox - why TEMPEST certify > the box which is attached to an unsecured net, with non TEMPEST > tranceivers ?? Someone must need this certification... > > [...] > > Geoffrey Baehr - N6LXA Network Research Corp > I have had the unfortunate experience of dealing with the TEMPEST environment. You are allowed to operate non-TEMPEST equipment in a TEMPEST-required environment if the building is fully shielded. Imagine someone running an Ethernet within a shielded room/building and wishing to connect to another such Ethernet somewhere else, where the interconnection must pass through a non-shielded area. In this case it makes sense to have a TEMPEST connection between two non-TEMPEST LANs. Brian Lloyd ...![bellcore!cp1]!yojna1!wb6rqn
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<130@yojna1.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!aplcen!cp1!yojna1!wb6rqnReferences:
<377@nrcvax.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site yojna1.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!aplcen!cp1!yojna1!wb6rqn From: wb6rqn@yojna1.UUCP (Brian Lloyd) Newsgroups: net.lan,net.dcom Subject: Re: More on Fiber Enet Rptrs Message-ID: <130@yojna1.UUCP> Date: Wed, 13-Nov-85 13:26:40 EST Article-I.D.: yojna1.130 Posted: Wed Nov 13 13:26:40 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 16-Nov-85 09:51:33 EST References: <377@nrcvax.UUCP> Organization: Yojna1 Amateur Radio Packet Unix System; Germantown, Md. Lines: 20