Re: Recommendations for a Pascal Compiler?

Article View: net.lang.pascal

Article #351

#351

From: daveb
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1986 18:25

7 lines
953 bytes

Regarding your comments about our RSTS compiler:  Did you have Pascal-1
or the later (and far superior) Pascal-2?  I'm pleased to report that
our customer support has been VASTLY improved over the last year and
a half (try it, you'll like it!).

In any event, we'd be happy to provide you with a free demo copy of the
MS-DOS Pascal.  We think you'll be pleased at the quality level.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <27@oresoft.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!tektronix!oresoft!daveb

References: <1679@drutx.UUCP> <26@oresoft.UUCP> <427@uwmacc.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!tektronix!oresoft!daveb
From: daveb@oresoft.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: Recommendations for a Pascal Compiler?
Message-ID: <27@oresoft.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 28-Oct-86 13:25:41 EST
Article-I.D.: oresoft.27
Posted: Tue Oct 28 13:25:41 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 29-Oct-86 04:24:42 EST
References: <1679@drutx.UUCP> <26@oresoft.UUCP> <427@uwmacc.UUCP>
Reply-To: daveb@oresoft.UUCP (David Barnes)
Distribution: na
Organization: Oregon Software, Portland OR
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message