Re: Recommendations for a Pascal Compiler?

Article View: net.lang.pascal

Article #352

#352

From: Richard D. Pierce
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1986 20:06

13 lines
1200 bytes

In article <27@oresoft.UUCP> daveb@oresoft.UUCP (David Barnes) writes:
->Regarding your comments about our RSTS compiler:  Did you have Pascal-1
->or the later (and far superior) Pascal-2?  I'm pleased to report that
->our customer support has been VASTLY improved over the last year and
->a half (try it, you'll like it!).
->

More specifically, I found significant problems with the Oregon Pascal
version prior to 1.2. Version 1.2 I found to be quite acceptable, not
suffering at all from the problems alluded to. Pascal-2 was a significant
further improvement.

Dikc Pierce

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3445@teddy.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!think!husc6!panda!teddy!rdp

References: <1679@drutx.UUCP> <26@oresoft.UUCP> <427@uwmacc.UUCP> <27@oresoft.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!think!husc6!panda!teddy!rdp
From: rdp@teddy.UUCP (Richard D. Pierce)
Newsgroups: net.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: Recommendations for a Pascal Compiler?
Message-ID: <3445@teddy.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 29-Oct-86 15:06:52 EST
Article-I.D.: teddy.3445
Posted: Wed Oct 29 15:06:52 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 29-Oct-86 22:37:32 EST
References: <1679@drutx.UUCP> <26@oresoft.UUCP> <427@uwmacc.UUCP> <27@oresoft.UUCP>
Reply-To: rdp@teddy.UUCP (Richard D. Pierce)
Distribution: na
Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass.
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message