Page 3 of 12 • 555 total threads
Discussion Threads in net.mail.headers
555 threads • Page 3 of 12| Thread Subject | Last Message |
|---|---|
|
Quiz - Parse this From line
By: dat on Thu, 19 Dec 1985 00:17 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Quiz - Parse this From line
By: Jordan Hayes on Wed, 18 Dec 1985 21:59 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
More on bizarre headers
By: dat on Tue, 17 Dec 1985 21:20 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
automatic generation of replies
By: Local on Wed, 11 Dec 1985 16:57 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
1 replies |
|
A suggestion for preventing machine mail loops
By: JCURRAN%UMASS.BITNET on Wed, 11 Dec 1985 07:54 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
1 replies |
|
(Copy) Re: A suggestion for preventing machine mail loops
By: Peter Sylvester +49 228 303245 on Wed, 11 Dec 1985 22:14 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
re: automatic generation of replies - return path
By: POSTEL on Wed, 11 Dec 1985 19:12 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Re: A suggestion for preventing machine mail loops
By: Peter Karp on Wed, 11 Dec 1985 08:35 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Re: help!
By: Duane Stone / McDonnell Douglas ... on Wed, 11 Dec 1985 02:30 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
help!
By: ken on Wed, 11 Dec 1985 01:27 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Need for new field in RFC and MHS standards
By: Peter Sylvester +49 228 303245 on Tue, 10 Dec 1985 10:55 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
extension fields
By: JCURRAN%UMASS.BITNET on Tue, 10 Dec 1985 05:46 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Need for new field in RFC and MHS standards
By: Tommy_Ericson__QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Tue, 10 Dec 1985 02:37 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
generated-by fields
By: JCURRAN%UMASS.BITNET on Mon, 09 Dec 1985 16:27 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Rcf822 extension fields
By: Marshall Rose on Mon, 09 Dec 1985 15:50 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Need for new field in RFC and MHS standards
By: Marshall Rose on Mon, 09 Dec 1985 15:50 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Re: new rfc822 header
By: ken on Mon, 09 Dec 1985 15:50 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Rcf822 extension fields
By: JCURRAN%UMASS.BITNET on Mon, 09 Dec 1985 15:49 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Need for new field in RFC and MHS standards
By: Henry Nussbacher on Mon, 09 Dec 1985 15:47 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
.US as an upper level domain
By: Henry Nussbacher on Sun, 24 Nov 1985 09:04 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
1 replies |
|
Headers using % hack
By: Dave Platt on Tue, 26 Nov 1985 20:48 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Correct header for \"%\" hack
By: Kevin Crowston on Mon, 25 Nov 1985 18:25 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
1 replies |
|
Correct header for \"%\" hack, Correct header for \"%\" hack
By: kevin kevin on Mon, 25 Nov 1985 23:09 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Re: CSNET ...
By: Dennis Rockwell on Mon, 25 Nov 1985 22:19 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
Re: CSNET ...
By: Jordan Hayes on Mon, 25 Nov 1985 05:23 |
40 Years 11 Months ago
0 replies |
|
EDU problems in Bitnet.
By: Jon Solomon on Tue, 19 Nov 1985 11:15 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: EDU problems in Bitnet.
By: Doron Shikmoni on Mon, 18 Nov 1985 02:41 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
(copy) Re: .EDU problems in Bitnet
By: RMXJ%CORNELLA.BITNET on Fri, 15 Nov 1985 19:52 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Domains and servers
By: Henry Nussbacher on Thu, 14 Nov 1985 15:29 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
an extant example of header munging by a mailer
By: Fred Christiansen on Thu, 14 Nov 1985 00:12 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: Tommy_Ericson__QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Mon, 04 Nov 1985 20:14 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Rewriting headers in general
By: Glenn Reid on Sun, 03 Nov 1985 08:40 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: the tty of Geoffrey S. Goodfello... on Fri, 01 Nov 1985 23:05 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: Postmaster + BITINFO on Fri, 01 Nov 1985 22:33 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
repeated text in message problem
By: POSTEL on Fri, 01 Nov 1985 01:54 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: Postmaster + BITINFO on Thu, 31 Oct 1985 11:14 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: Postmaster + BITINFO on Thu, 31 Oct 1985 10:00 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Columbia usage of internet domain
By: Henry Nussbacher on Thu, 31 Oct 1985 08:59 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: mail from Berkeley hosts
By: Marshall Rose on Thu, 31 Oct 1985 03:03 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: mail from Berkeley hosts
By: Ron Natalie on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 23:56 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: Christopher A. Kent on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 21:09 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: don.provan on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 20:05 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: John A. Dilley on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 18:08 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: Barry Leiner on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 17:03 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Columbia usage of internet domain
By: Rudy.Nedved on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 15:17 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Columbia usage of internet domain
By: Doron Shikmoni on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 10:39 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: Postmaster + BITINFO on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 10:18 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Re: Mail to UC Berkeley hosts
By: the tty of Geoffrey S. Goodfello... on Tue, 29 Oct 1985 08:12 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
Mail to UC Berkeley hosts
By: Postmaster + BITINFO on Tue, 29 Oct 1985 08:12 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
|
mail from Berkeley hosts
By: Mark Crispin on Mon, 28 Oct 1985 16:21 |
41 Years ago
0 replies |
Page 3 of 12 • 555 total threads
Thread Navigation
Threads show conversation groups with message counts
Click thread titles to view the full discussion
G to switch to chronological article view