🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: John A. Dilley on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 18:08

Re: Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: Barry Leiner on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 17:03

Re: Columbia usage of internet domain
By: Rudy.Nedved on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 15:17

Columbia usage of internet domain
By: Doron Shikmoni on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 10:39

Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers
By: Postmaster + BITINFO on Wed, 30 Oct 1985 10:18

Re: Mail to UC Berkeley hosts
By: the tty of Geoffrey S. Goodfello... on Tue, 29 Oct 1985 08:12

Mail to UC Berkeley hosts
By: Postmaster + BITINFO on Tue, 29 Oct 1985 08:12

mail from Berkeley hosts
By: Mark Crispin on Mon, 28 Oct 1985 16:21

rfc standards documentation
By: Robert Viduya on Tue, 01 Oct 1985 00:57

MIT-Multics Failed Mail handling, again ...
By: Einar Stefferud on Wed, 25 Sep 1985 20:25

(copy) Msg of Sunday, 22 September 1985 17:
By: RMXJ%CORNELLA.BITNET on Mon, 23 Sep 1985 06:56

Re: proposed Mail Transfer Protocol
By: Bob Kummerfeld on Mon, 23 Sep 1985 01:48

X.400/MHS implementation
By: RMXJ%CORNELLA.BITNET on Sun, 22 Sep 1985 21:19

re: proposed mail transfer protocol - multimedia
By: Dave Cohrs on Fri, 20 Sep 1985 13:28

RFC920 country codes
By: Henry Nussbacher on Fri, 20 Sep 1985 08:43

re: proposed mail transfer protocol - multimedia
By: POSTEL on Fri, 20 Sep 1985 02:48

re: invalid names & multiple names & Godot
By: POSTEL on Thu, 19 Sep 1985 20:21

Invalid/questionable host names in mail
By: Rich Wales on Wed, 18 Sep 1985 19:24

proposed Mail Transfer Protocol
By: Mark Crispin on Wed, 18 Sep 1985 22:22

Echos
By: Peter Sylvester on Wed, 11 Sep 1985 22:38

BITNET to ARPA munging (long 156 lines)
By: zben on Tue, 10 Sep 1985 07:54

ARPA to BITNET munging - example (long 270 lines)
By: zben on Tue, 10 Sep 1985 07:43

Re: Sendmail munges addresses containing dollar signs.
By: Stephen Hemminger on Tue, 10 Sep 1985 15:11

Sendmail munges addresses containing dollar signs.
By: Jon Solomon on Sun, 08 Sep 1985 17:19

Re: Sendmail
By: Jordan Hayes on Mon, 09 Sep 1985 21:32

Re: Sendmail munges addresses containing dollar signs.
By: Chris Torek on Sun, 08 Sep 1985 03:47

Re: Sendmail munges addresses containing dollar signs.
By: Chris Maio on Sun, 08 Sep 1985 00:25

Sendmail munges addresses containing dollar signs.
By: mcgregor%hplabs.csnet on Sat, 07 Sep 1985 20:28

Sendmail munges addresses containing dollar signs.
By: mcgregor%hplabs.csnet on Sat, 07 Sep 1985 20:00

Sendmail munges addresses containing dollar signs.
By: mcgregor%hplabs.csnet on Sat, 07 Sep 1985 19:54

Sendmail munges addresses containing dollar signs.
By: mcgregor%hplabs.csnet on Sat, 07 Sep 1985 19:51

Sendmail munges addresses containing dollar signs.
By: mcgregor%hplabs.csnet on Sat, 07 Sep 1985 19:49

mail getting to purdue
By: Paul M. Albitz on Mon, 26 Aug 1985 17:46

PROFS to RFC822/SMTP conversion?
By: Michael C. Berch on Sat, 24 Aug 1985 00:23

Re: Avoiding expansion of mail's metacharacters
By: Peter Honeyman on Fri, 23 Aug 1985 01:30

Re: Re: Avoiding expansion of mail's metacharacters
By: Eric N. Starkman on Thu, 22 Aug 1985 19:45

Re: Re: Avoiding expansion of mail's metacharacters
By: Barry Margolin on Thu, 22 Aug 1985 06:17

Re: From: and To: in UUCP land
By: Hokey on Sat, 17 Aug 1985 04:15

From: and To: in UUCP land
By: Hokey on Thu, 15 Aug 1985 04:02

Re: From: and To: in UUCP land
By: Lauren Weinstein on Thu, 15 Aug 1985 17:48

Non-domain-style nicknames in outgoing mail
By: Rich Wales on Fri, 09 Aug 1985 01:23

Re: SMTP source verification.
By: Mats_Ohlin_FOA2%QZCOM.MAILNET on Tue, 06 Aug 1985 22:08

Please remove
By: Peter Stokes on Wed, 07 Aug 1985 16:51

Re: SMTP source verification.
By: Jean Darling on Tue, 06 Aug 1985 22:22

Re: SMTP source verification.
By: Jordan Hayes on Thu, 01 Aug 1985 17:07

Re: SMTP source verification.
By: Hans-Werner_Braun%UMich-MTS.Mail... on Wed, 31 Jul 1985 14:10

Re: SMTP source verification.
By: Scott Alexander on Wed, 31 Jul 1985 01:52

Re: SMTP source verification.
By: E. Howard Alt on Tue, 30 Jul 1985 22:04

Re: SMTP source verification.
By: Einar Stefferud on Wed, 31 Jul 1985 07:25

Re: SMTP source verification.
By: E. Howard Alt on Tue, 30 Jul 1985 20:27

SMTP source verification.
By: Hans-Werner_Braun%UMich-MTS.Mail... on Tue, 30 Jul 1985 18:14

Re: Some Article Which Notes Threw Away The Title To
By: Joel West on Fri, 26 Jul 1985 22:41

US participation in ISO SC18/WG4
By: Ronald B. Harvey on Wed, 24 Jul 1985 22:43

ANSI participation on messaging/conferencing
By: Ronald B. Harvey on Thu, 25 Jul 1985 01:28

Re: Some Article Which Notes Threw Away The Title To
By: Guy Harris on Sun, 21 Jul 1985 22:39

Domains
By: Kevin Crowston on Sun, 21 Jul 1985 22:47

Re: RFCs
By: Peter Honeyman on Sat, 20 Jul 1985 19:58

Domains and routing
By: Hokey on Sat, 20 Jul 1985 23:29

Re: Orphaned Response
By: jad on Tue, 16 Jul 1985 01:42

> %FROM: Rich Wales <wales@UCLA-LOCUS.ARPA>
By: Jacob_Palme_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Tue, 16 Jul 1985 16:27

Re: Subject: Ambiguity with the REPLY-TO field
By: Jacob_Palme_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Wed, 17 Jul 1985 18:38

REPLY-TO field
By: Mark Crispin on Mon, 15 Jul 1985 16:23

Re: Subject: Ambiguity with the REPLY-TO field
By: Rich Wales on Mon, 15 Jul 1985 16:21

Re: Subject: Ambiguity with the REPLY-TO field
By: Jacob_Palme_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Mon, 15 Jul 1985 16:20

Re: Subject: Ambiguity with the REPLY-TO field
By: Einar Stefferud on Mon, 15 Jul 1985 16:01

Re: Subject: Ambiguity with the REPLY-TO field
By: Rich Wales on Sat, 13 Jul 1985 00:38

Subject: Ambiguity with the REPLY-TO field
By: Jacob_Palme_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Fri, 12 Jul 1985 23:42

Re: reordering header lines
By: Dan Hoey on Thu, 11 Jul 1985 15:13

Re: reordering header lines
By: Einar Stefferud on Thu, 11 Jul 1985 18:54

Re: Subject: Ambiguity with the REPLY-TO field
By: don.provan on Sat, 13 Jul 1985 02:09

Question about ARPA addresses
By: Bob Hoffman on Wed, 03 Jul 1985 15:07

Re: RFC920 domains
By: Guy Harris on Tue, 02 Jul 1985 06:47

Re: Is there a standard format for cross-domain addresses?
By: zben on Sat, 29 Jun 1985 17:32

Re: RFC920 domains
By: Jeff Lee on Fri, 28 Jun 1985 16:12

Re: RFC920 domains
By: Pedro Celis on Thu, 27 Jun 1985 14:13

Re: RFC920 domains
By: Jordan Hayes on Wed, 26 Jun 1985 21:18

Re: RFC920 domains
By: Joel West on Tue, 25 Jun 1985 07:24

Re: Is there a standard format for cross-domain addresses?
By: Hokey on Tue, 25 Jun 1985 17:23

Is there a standard format for cross-domain addresses?
By: Jeff Lee on Sun, 23 Jun 1985 17:32

Re: Why "From cbosgd!cbosgd.ATT.UUCP!chris" isn't stupid
By: Hokey on Wed, 19 Jun 1985 21:06

Re: RFC920 domains
By: Joe Kelsey on Fri, 14 Jun 1985 20:44

Re: RFC920 domains vs. cow patties (flame)
By: Jordan Hayes on Sat, 15 Jun 1985 16:41

Re: Why "From cbosgd!cbosgd.ATT.UUCP!chris" isn't stupid
By: Jordan Hayes on Thu, 13 Jun 1985 16:54

Re: Why "From cbosgd!cbosgd.ATT.UUCP!chris" isn't stupid
By: J. Eric Roskos on Wed, 12 Jun 1985 12:12

Re: RFC920 domains
By: Jordan Hayes on Wed, 12 Jun 1985 04:36

Re: Why "From cbosgd!cbosgd.ATT.UUCP!chris" isn't stupid
By: David Herron, NPR Lover on Tue, 11 Jun 1985 06:32

Re: Why "From cbosgd!cbosgd.ATT.UUCP!chris" isn't stupid
By: Greg Skinner on Sat, 08 Jun 1985 19:32

Re: Why "From cbosgd!cbosgd.ATT.UUCP!chris" isn't stupid
By: Hokey on Thu, 06 Jun 1985 04:00

Re: Why "From cbosgd!cbosgd.ATT.UUCP!chris" isn't stupid
By: Frederick M. Avolio on Thu, 06 Jun 1985 14:08

Re: Why "From cbosgd!cbosgd.ATT.UUCP!chris" isn't stupid
By: Peter Honeyman on Mon, 03 Jun 1985 15:27

Why "From cbosgd!cbosgd.ATT.UUCP!chris" isn't stupid
By: Christopher Seiwald on Mon, 03 Jun 1985 04:41

Re: Header-People and X.400
By: Steve Tepper on Sat, 01 Jun 1985 06:43

Re: Header-People and X.400
By: Doug Kingston on Thu, 30 May 1985 22:26

Header-People and X.400
By: AlHall.osbunorth on Thu, 30 May 1985 20:01

address change
By: root on Thu, 30 May 1985 16:12

Fully qualified nodenames
By: Henry Nussbacher on Wed, 29 May 1985 15:51

Re: Names with spaces
By: Peter Honeyman on Tue, 28 May 1985 00:03

Domain names defaulting
By: Tommy_Ericson__QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Sat, 25 May 1985 01:01

Re: Names with spaces
By: zben on Thu, 23 May 1985 13:37

Re: Names with spaces
By: Ron Natalie on Thu, 23 May 1985 22:21

Lack of domain name
By: Henry Nussbacher on Thu, 23 May 1985 07:21

Re: Names with spaces
By: Barry Margolin on Thu, 23 May 1985 05:07

Re: Names with spaces
By: Steve Tepper on Thu, 23 May 1985 01:57

And, speaking of bad headers (blush!)
By: Dave Platt on Thu, 23 May 1985 01:16

Names with spaces, underscores, quoted names, etc.
By: Dave Platt on Thu, 23 May 1985 00:01

Re: Names with spaces
By: the tty of Geoffrey S. Goodfello... on Wed, 22 May 1985 21:45

Names with spaces
By: Murray.pa on Wed, 22 May 1985 20:10

Domain names
By: Murray.pa on Wed, 22 May 1985 08:33

Re: AMES-VMSB and \".decnet\" domain
By: Ron Natalie on Wed, 22 May 1985 01:26

Re: AMES-VMSB and \".decnet\" domain
By: Mark Crispin on Tue, 21 May 1985 23:41

re: strange domains (e.g., \"decnet\")
By: POSTEL on Tue, 21 May 1985 23:21

AMES-VMSB and \".decnet\" domain
By: Mark Crispin on Tue, 21 May 1985 22:02

Re: those colons again
By: Jordan Hayes on Mon, 22 Apr 1985 10:23

those colons again
By: Laura Creighton on Mon, 15 Apr 1985 15:54

SMTP for WANG ???
By: POSTEL on Sat, 13 Apr 1985 02:30

Re: Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID.
By: Jay Lepreau on Tue, 09 Apr 1985 06:53

Re: Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID.
By: Joseph S. D. Yao on Mon, 25 Mar 1985 20:33

TCP/IP: How to make it go ?
By: J. Gordon Beattie Jr. on Thu, 21 Mar 1985 14:46

Re: Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID.
By: Laura Creighton on Mon, 18 Mar 1985 21:30

Re: Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID.
By: John Gilmore on Wed, 13 Mar 1985 13:03

Re: Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID.
By: Jacob_Palme_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Tue, 12 Mar 1985 10:28

Re: Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID.
By: Jacob_Palme_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Sat, 09 Mar 1985 20:23

Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID.
By: Jacob_Palme_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Sat, 09 Mar 1985 03:50

Re: Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID.
By: Craig.Everhart on Fri, 08 Mar 1985 17:08

Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID.
By: Torgny_Tholerus_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Thu, 07 Mar 1985 23:44

Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID.
By: Jacob_Palme_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET on Thu, 07 Mar 1985 23:44

Re: Firewalls in sendmail
By: Lee McLoughlin on Thu, 28 Feb 1985 01:39

Re: capitalization
By: Joseph S. D. Yao on Tue, 26 Feb 1985 04:59