🚀 go-pugleaf

> Xref: cbmvax net.micro.6809:189 net.micro:1303 net.micro.atari16:1512 net.micro.amiga:2113
> 
> Yes, I REALLY wish the Coco3 had 384-400 vertical lines.
> Personally, I rate resolution more important than palette size,
> tho you're right, it's almost a waste of analog RGB to skimp on it.

Resolution and palette are often used as substitutes for one-another when
displaying images, as any MAC or hi-res ST user can tell you.

> Of course we know the 68K machines are better in every way than the MSDOS
> biz boxes.  It's just that the 3-piece suit types who define the "real
> world" don't see it that way.  Fortunately biz types are finding how useful
> color graphics and mouse pointing can be.

Though some places you can't buy anything except a PC.  There are actually
aftermarket 68000 boards that fit in a PC case and replace the ENTIRE
motherboard.  That's so engineers, etc., can get the order for a PC through
purchasing, and the 68000 board as simply an "add-on".  The suits are wasting
too much money with the IBM-only attitude; hopefully that won't last much
longer.

> I'm glad you appreciate the 6809 so highly.  Interesting idea, putting
> segment registers in it, tho the opcodes are long enuf already.

I've been working with 8-bitters too long not to appreciate it.

> 
>>  Of course, all of the 68000 machines
>> will be able to run UNIX quite nicely, along with OS-9 68K, the version of
>> OS-9 for grownups.
> That's U**X without MMU or protection, as has been argued to death
> already.  The Coco3 will do a safer job on OS9 Level II than the
> Amiga or ST can on U**X.  Of course OS9/68K is better than 6809 versions,
> tho many of the improvements could be retrofit into 6809 versions,
> given the extra memory now available.

The Amiga could easily use either Motorola 68000 family MMU, or a custom
MMU, if hardware protection is required.  And a 68010 would really help
things along.

>> Your're right on the code compactness.  Much of the size of the
>> code will depend on whether a compiler or an assembler is used and if a
>> compiler, how efficient it is.
> Boy is that the truth!  6809 OS9 was written in assembler, much of
> 68K in C, and it shows in the code size.
> 
>> Dave Haynie    {caip,ihnp4,allegra,seismo}!cbmvax!daveh
> -- 
> Mike J Knudsen /  \   ...ihnp4!ihwpt!knudsen
>               / NO \
> Bell Labs    / BABY \   (312)-979-4132 (work)
>  (AT & T)   /ON BOARD\
>             \GO AHEAD/    BORED SAILORS
> IH 6D-319    \ & HIT/   go BOARDSAILING.
> x4132         \ ME /
>                \  /
> Bell Labs pays  \/   me for my thoughts; my opinions are al mine!
-- 
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Dave Haynie    {caip,ihnp4,allegra,seismo}!cbmvax!daveh

	"I gained nothing at all from Supreme Enlightenment, and
	 for that very reason it is called Supreme Enlightenment."
							-Gotama Buddha

	These opinions are my own, though for a small fee they be yours too.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/