🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: net.micro.atari8
1 messages
1 total messages Started by Malloy Fri, 28 Feb 1986 08:07
The correct use of the atari sub-groups
#10
Author: Malloy
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1986 08:07
58 lines
3480 bytes
> Newsgroups: net.micro.atari8
> Subject: re CPM/68K vs TOS
> 
> Terry-
> Hmmm, looks like that we've got a problem here...
> When the ST was presented to the public all testers told that it is
> using an enhanced CPM/68k. They also told that the disks use the IBM
> PC format. Actually it's the same, except 2 small differences. If you
> add a 5" floppy to the ST you can transfer ONE file at a time (with
> more you get problems with the file allocation table) from the PC to
> the ST and vice versa. In the 'Hitchhikers Guide to the BIOS' and
> in the documentation they compare their system quite much with MS-DOS
> (sometimes to often). Actually it is very similar to MS-DOS (not only
> Unix; like I told before). The subdirectories are handeled like in
> MS-DOS. I never worked with CPM/68k but there was a time when I wanted
> to build such a system (was too expensive), so I know at least some
> facts about it. Unfortunately I don't have access to my documentations
> right now... but I'll dig it out when there is need for it.
> (Then I can post a comparison of the system calls.)
> In general you push your desired function on the stack and call the
> system. And this functions are different in both OS's as I know.
> Next: You've got several system components: GEMDOS,BIOS,XBIOS,GEM and a
> grafics kernel. GEMDOS is not GEM, it's more like BDOS in CP/M.
> The XBIOS is an extension of the BIOS. The kernel supports the GEM (You
> can use it without GEM if you like). Even without GEM the TOS doesn't
> look like CPM/68k. Try to run an CPM program (of course from the TOS)
> und you'll see what happens...several bombs...reset....:-)
> 
>   The problem is that ATARI had the intention to use CPM (and told so)
> but changed their mind later on. But several M-magazines are still
> writing something about CPM68k on the ST. If they would have tried
> to run an CPM program the would have known better.
> Finally, I'm not the ultimate source for such informations, I know
> some facts but not all...feel free to revise the above.
> 
> Johann Zuschlag (I6191008@DBSTU1.BITNET)
> 

* * * * FLAME ON * * * *

	Well, I have had enough.  This posting is 100% ST.  It has
absolutly no relation to the Atari 8 bit computers.  It was posted
by some A**H*** at info-atari.  They are the ones that split the
group in the first place.  He should know better.  But he doesn't.

KEEP THE ST CR*P OFF ATARI8.  PUT THE ST SH*T IN ATARI16.

* * * * * flame off * * * * (Until another ST posting is made.)


From inside the Tesseract of
	Clancy Malloy
	(ihnp4!ihlpa!freak)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Everyone looked up and realized that we were only tenants of this world; |
|    We have been given a new lease, and a warning, from the landlord.     |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads