Re: 32332: how much faster than the 32032 ?

Article View: net.micro.ns32k

Article #42

#42

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1986 18:30

8 lines
873 bytes

> ...In short the 32332 is a *YUMMO* part.

In fact, it's what the 32032 *should* have been.  If National had been
shipping this at 32032 time, the 32000 series would have been a roaring
success.  As it is, I fear the 32332 is too little too late.
-- 
				Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
				{allegra,ihnp4,decvax,pyramid}!utzoo!henry

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7115@utzoo.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <15218@mordor.ARPA>, <3657@amdahl.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer)
Newsgroups: net.micro.ns32k
Subject: Re: 32332: how much faster than the 32032 ?
Message-ID: <7115@utzoo.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 11-Sep-86 14:30:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: utzoo.7115
Posted: Thu Sep 11 14:30:28 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Sep-86 14:30:28 EDT
References: <15218@mordor.ARPA>, <3657@amdahl.UUCP>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message