Re: 32332: how much faster than the 32032 ?

Article View: net.micro.ns32k

Article #43

#43

From: Brian Thomson
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1986 17:47

7 lines
898 bytes

We don't have 32032s here, but we have compared 32016s vs. 32332s
running 4.2bsd with a Fuji Eagle and have found the 10 MHz 332 to be about
twice the speed of the 016, or roughly 1.2 VAX 780s for CPU-intensive
non floating-point benchmarks.
-- 
			Brian Thomson,	    CSRG Univ. of Toronto
			{linus,ihnp4,uw-beaver,floyd,utzoo}!utcsrgv!thomson

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2306@utai.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcsri!utai!thomson

References: <15218@mordor.ARPA> <3657@amdahl.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utai.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcsri!utai!thomson
From: thomson@utai.UUCP (Brian Thomson)
Newsgroups: net.micro.ns32k
Subject: Re: 32332: how much faster than the 32032 ?
Message-ID: <2306@utai.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 11-Sep-86 13:47:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: utai.2306
Posted: Thu Sep 11 13:47:05 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Sep-86 14:43:24 EDT
References: <15218@mordor.ARPA> <3657@amdahl.UUCP>
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message