Article View: net.nlang.celts
Article #91Stonehenge, an anthropomorphism
From: Tobias D. Robison
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 1984 04:46
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 1984 04:46
13 lines
1150 bytes
1150 bytes
References: When my family visited Stonehenge in 1971 (we were able to wander among the stones then), I was struck by the fact that many of the vertical stones seemed to have suggestions of faces or bodies on them. I took slides of about 6 or 8, ranging from very clear to very vague in their human features. Making allowances for weathering, it seemed possible that many of the vertical pieces were once statues. Have other people speculated about this, or is there evidence suggesting the contrary? - Toby Robison (not Robinson!) allegra!eosp1!robison decvax!ittvax!eosp1!robison
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<994@eosp1.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!eosp1!robisonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site eosp1.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!eosp1!robison From: robison@eosp1.UUCP (Tobias D. Robison) Newsgroups: net.nlang.celts Subject: Stonehenge, an anthropomorphism Message-ID: <994@eosp1.UUCP> Date: Wed, 11-Jul-84 00:46:52 EDT Article-I.D.: eosp1.994 Posted: Wed Jul 11 00:46:52 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 11-Jul-84 07:07:31 EDT Organization: Exxon Office Systems, Princeton, NJ Lines: 13