🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

6 total messages Started by Nigel Allen Wed, 04 Nov 1992 07:10
"general" is a bad name for a newsgroup
#103
Author: Nigel Allen
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 07:10
27 lines
1822 bytes
If you have a local newsgroup called "general", you will sometimes find
articles from other sites in that newsgroup. These articles will normally
have been cross-posted to general (by which the original poster meant
their *own* general newsgroup) and to a more widely-distributed group.
These other-site posts to general can confuse your users. (In fact, if you
check general on your own site, you may find some fairly shrill arguments
about the U.S. presidential election that were cross-posted to soc.singles
and general.)

My advice, for what it's worth, is not to use "general" as the name for
your local general newsgroup. Instead, name it <site name>.general. 
For example, contact.uucp, a now-defunct public access site in Toronto,
called its general newsgroup contact.general. 

This way, both your users and the rest of the net will benefit. They won't
wonder about (or reply or follow up to) posts from other sites in "general",
and if they should cross-post an article to your local <site name>.general
and a more widely-distributed one, it won't show up in "general" at othe
sites.

I suppose this idea must have been porposed before, but "general" still
seems to be the name most sites have chosen for their local general newsgroup.

Nigel Allen          nigel.allen@bbs.oit.unc.edu

(The usual disclaimers apply. My opinions only.)
Re: "general" is a bad name for a newsgroup
#3192
Author: Felix Lee
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 04:09
16 lines
1054 bytes
> If you have a local newsgroup called "general", you will sometimes find
> articles from other sites in that newsgroup.

This is the "newsgroup splicing" problem, which I've been thinking
about, but do not have a working solution yet.

Either: 1. all newsgroup names must be globally unique;
    or: 2a. sites can carry "different" groups with the same name.

A related proposition:
        2b. sites can carry the "same" group under different names.

Both 2b and 2a are necessary to support transparent newsgroup
renaming.  Implementing this requires somewhat different news
protocols.
--
Re: "general" is a bad name for a newsgroup
#3193
Author: David Gibbs
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 06:15
21 lines
1438 bytes
In article <1992Nov4.071034.5756@samba.oit.unc.edu> Nigel.Allen@launchpad.unc.edu (Nigel Allen) writes:
>This way, both your users and the rest of the net will benefit. They won't
>wonder about (or reply or follow up to) posts from other sites in "general",
>and if they should cross-post an article to your local <site name>.general
>and a more widely-distributed one, it won't show up in "general" at othe
>sites.
>

Of course, this doesn't always work since you sometime get duplicated
<site name>.general postings.  Specifically I know that uw.general
exists at both University of Waterloo (Waterloo Ontario) and 
University of Washington (in Seattle WA), and that often messages
ended up in both.  (Those this might have been secondarily caused
by uw.general (Waterloo) being carried at Microsoft because of
all the Waterloo co-op students and grads.)

I have also seen this duplication in one or two other cases, but
I can't remember the names right now.

-David Gibbs
(dagibbs@quantum.qnx.com)
Re: "general" is a bad name for a newsgroup
#3191
Author: Craig Richmond - division
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 07:13
26 lines
1911 bytes
Nigel.Allen@launchpad.unc.edu (Nigel Allen) writes:

>If you have a local newsgroup called "general", you will sometimes find
>articles from other sites in that newsgroup. These articles will normally
>have been cross-posted to general (by which the original poster meant
>their *own* general newsgroup) and to a more widely-distributed group.
>These other-site posts to general can confuse your users. (In fact, if you
>check general on your own site, you may find some fairly shrill arguments
>about the U.S. presidential election that were cross-posted to soc.singles
>and general.)

I think the general news group is one that c-news or nn create
automatically which explains why so many sites end up with it.  Also,
choosing a name like cs.general is also a bad idea because it confused me
for quite some time how the only things that ever appeared in our own
cs.general newsgroup were from exotic locations outside the department and
also parts of threads that were not in the group either.  I eventaully
cottoned on to what was happening when one of the aforementioned articles
was someone testing his theory of cross-posting :-)

Craig
--
Craig Richmond.  Computer Officer -  Dept of Economics (morning) 380 3860
  University of Western Australia    Dept of Education (afternoon)
craig@ecel.uwa.edu.au Dvorak Keyboards RULE!  "Messes are only acceptable
if users make them.  Applications aren't allowed this freedom" I.M.VI 2-4
Advertising on Net:how can we stop it?
#3747
Author: Reno Marioni
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:43
47 lines
1753 bytes
Hello,
Is there a admin or USENET cop who can stop certain people from
continuously advertising on the net dispite numerous warnings from
many people on the net.  This guy from ICPA has posted an ad at LEAST
3 times on one newsgroup and cross posted to many others.

How can we stop this unethical violation of the network????


Here is his post or part of it as I don't want them to get
further adverts from my post :

=================================================================


Article 8604 (19 more) in soc.culture.australian:
From: icpa@iat.holonet.net (Tony Rodriguez)

Subject: International Software Jobs
Message-ID: <Bxo8p1.2D5@iat.holonet.net>
Organization: HoloNet (BBS: 510-704-1058)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 20:24:37 GMT
Lines: 28

	The International Computer Professional Association is a member 
supported organization for experienced software professionals who want to
work overseas. By using our network of over 750 technical recruitment firms 
(stuff deleted)


Sincerely 

Tony Rodriguez

Director ICPA


International Computer Professional Association
2261 Market Street, Suite 309
San Francisco, CA 94114
USA

Tel: (415) 695 - 7618
Fax: (415) 252 - 5769

email icpa@holonet.net
Re: Advertising on Net:how can we stop it?
#3751
Author: ETHICAL SOLUTIONS
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 13:48
32 lines
1965 bytes
In article <lgitbkINNhm2@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>, reno@darlo.Eng.Sun.COM (Reno Marioni) writes:
|> 
|> Hello,
|> Is there a admin or USENET cop who can stop certain people from
|> continuously advertising on the net dispite numerous warnings from
|> many people on the net.  This guy from ICPA has posted an ad at LEAST
|> 3 times on one newsgroup and cross posted to many others.
|> 
|> How can we stop this unethical violation of the network????
|> 
|> 
|> 

A good question, Reno and one which has been worrying lots of people for a LONG time...

Well, Reno - and all you other netters - you'll be pleased to hear that ETHICAL SOLUTIONS has come up with the answer!  Yes, you never believed you'd see it but here it is and it's available right NOW!!

Just email to ETHICAL SOLUTIONS and mark your mail "Dept boring.boring.boring" for details.  For just $10.00 you could find the answer to all those important questions in life like:

	"How do you spell "BORING" backwards?"

	"Will there ever be anything interesting on this net?"

	"How did I get to be SO boring that things like networks seem important?"

	"Who the hell is Dave Hayes and are they out to get him?"		    
	"Who gives a shit?"

Mail us NOW and we'll include a FREE cuddly washable toy computer with your first order so you need never be without your SPECIAL FRIEND...


ETHICAL - YOUR PARTNER FOR REALITY
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads