🚀 go-pugleaf

We agree however what we might not agree on is controls.  For 30 years
we had controls and the events since 1973 prove that we need those controls
again.  We also need another source of energy.  Many people can't afford
their own heat right now.  So we have LEAP? What is wrong with this? What
kind of society do we have where people can't pay for lights and heating?
There has to be, must be a solution and higher profits, higher pricing is
not
going to get it.  Who occupies the White House certainly has nothing to do
with this.  Controls must come from congress, but the President can
influence
what they do.  My issue with George B is that he is in the Oil Business.
Frankly, I voted for Gore....on the issues and not because I didn't like one
or the other.  I am not upset that Bush won.  There isn't anyone out there I
really want to occupy the white house right now.  Where/who is he?
....Ted

"sediment boy" <palimpsest9823@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:92ih3k$kdo$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> I work in the oil business and guess what. It does not matter who is in
> the white house or congress as long as wall street is involved. So many
> people are looking for a quick buck that in order for a comapany to
> stay competative, they have to show solid performance on a quarterly
> basis. Anyway, sorry about the soapboxing but we Americans are REALLY
> spoiled by cheap undervalued energy. Get used to energy costs rising.
> Realistically, we wont'run out of oil, just out of cheap oil. There is
> sooooooo much oil out there, the problem is we keep having to go deeper
> and deeper to get it. Also, natural gas is virtually inexhaustable. You
> ever see an oil rig with a bright flame burning off of it? That's
> excess natural gas that the just burn off because there's no market for
> it. That market is starting to expand with these high gas prices. Oh,
> by the way I agree, name calling of Clinton is not an intelligent
> approach to anything but instead the refuge of a lazy mind, I am no
> clinton lover by any means but come on pal.
>
>
> In article <ir136.609$8r2.69511@newshog.newsread.com>,
>   "Ted Morgen" <tmorgen@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Calling Clinton names is unbecoming to intelligence.  Haven't you
> discovered
> > that yet?  Clinton did the only thing that was opened to him at that
> time
> > and
> > this time.  He released some of the oil reserves.
> > Personally, I wish he had released them all.  Drain the pond and
> perhaps the
> > people will wake up.  Necessity is still the mother of invention.
> Once oil
> > is
> > so rare that it can no longer provide energy needs to the world,
> we'll have
> > a
> > new source of energy.  Of course if we don't control that source, we
> either
> > pay more than we can afford or the source itself will dry up.
> > ...Ted
> >
> > "JohnDoe" <JohnDoe@monmouth.com> wrote in message
> > news:8srn4tcku8mst58rdq1ndod0pcpt7ouctl@4ax.com...
> > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 18:16:44 -0500, Father McClay
> <mcclay@nospam.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >The Clinton Administration was working out a solution. Now
> > > >things may get worse because George Bush is an oil man.
> > > >Expect to pay much, much more in the coming months/years.
> > >
> > > what solution are you babbling about? home heating oil prices
> doubled
> > > last year and this year natural gas prices have risen 260%, and
> there
> > > has been nothing done by clinton's gang of thugs
> >
> >
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/