Re: Constitutional-amendment ballot proposal

Article View: ny.general

Article #441

#441

From: M. John Matlaw
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:13

25 lines
2762 bytes

Actually, I believe there was only one NYS constitutional amendment and
I believe it passed.  (Changed gender specific language to gender
neuteral language in the statge's constitution.)  The other changes were
to the NYC charter and I believe they all passed as well.

danny burstein wrote:
> 
> In <cdd38ddd.0111261224.19390af9@posting.google.com> mhamm@gc.cuny.edu (msh210) writes:
> 
> >I asked in ny.politics, but got no response, so ask here now:
> >> I never saw the result of the Constitutional-
> >> amendment ballot proposal. Did it pass? Any
> >> numbers availabale? Tia.
> 
> It might help a bit if you mentioned which amendments you're referring to,
> especially since you're cross posting this to lots of different geographic
> newsgroups.
> 
> If you're talking about the ones in NYS, then yes, they all passed.
> 
> --
> _____________________________________________________
> Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
>                      dannyb@panix.com
> [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <uzKM7.238100$W8.8169166@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!news-out.worldnet.att.net.MISMATCH!wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.72!wnfilter2!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail

References:

<cdd38ddd.0111131503.7101eae5@posting.google.com> <cdd38ddd.0111261224.19390af9@posting.google.com> <9tua48$ftd$1@panix2.panix.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106b4e,24552fec8fe63278
X-Google-Attributes: gid106b4e,public
X-Google-Thread: 110b47,24552fec8fe63278
X-Google-Attributes: gid110b47,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,24552fec8fe63278
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a12a,public
X-Google-Thread: 104158,24552fec8fe63278
X-Google-Attributes: gid104158,public
X-Google-Thread: feb97,24552fec8fe63278
X-Google-Attributes: gidfeb97,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-27 03:16:45 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!news-out.worldnet.att.net.MISMATCH!wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.72!wnfilter2!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "M. John Matlaw" <mjohnlaw@nospam.*att.net>
Reply-To: mjohnlaw@att.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: ny.general,talk.politics.misc,capdist.misc,wny.general,nyc.politics
Subject: Re: Constitutional-amendment ballot proposal
References: <cdd38ddd.0111131503.7101eae5@posting.google.com> <cdd38ddd.0111261224.19390af9@posting.google.com> <9tua48$ftd$1@panix2.panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <uzKM7.238100$W8.8169166@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:13:30 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.88.87.103
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1006859610 12.88.87.103 (Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:13:30 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:13:30 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet

Reply to Parent Message