🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 19:58:28 GMT, slim
<pickin's@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

>
>
>Phil wrote:
>> 
>> On 5 Sep 2005 23:03:13 -0700, "moorehead"
>> <moorehead_johnson@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >> He was on vacation.
>> >>
>> >
>> >No such thing.  Sorry!
>> 
>> Mike is just upset that Bush wasn't down there from day one,

  Yeah, bet he could have cleared even more brush while
there were people,  U.S. citizens starving and
dehydrating to death in NO.  Mike is upset because they
didn't bother the president with this little matter.
Hey Mike,  don't you know what a VACATION is?
A vacation is just that,  a vacation away from the
pressing cares of the world,  a time for Bush to rest,
relax and reflect on his successes while preparing
himself to go back to wash dc,  strong and ready to
start more international wars,  cut more taxes and
appoint loons and cronies to high position where they
can earn a good living...  And be used as fodder to
take blame for anything that happens that Bush should
have known about...  

  Look Mike,  just how long is it that you've been an
American?  Don't you realize how this country works?
It's supposed to be a "winner take all", game,  you
can't blame Bush for winning and taking.  Are you?
For shame if you are.  

>
>HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DOWN THERE FROM DAY ONE!
>
>HE SHOULD HAVE SHOWN COMPASSION AND LEADERSHIP.
>
>Instead, he took two more days on his FIVE WEEK VACATION!
>
>> personally throwing sandbags on the levee.  Anything less than that
>> isn't enough.
>
>I never said that, Phil.
>
>That make you a liar in addtion to being a drunk, but
>the two usually go together,

0[ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ]0
  Liars share with those they deceive 
  the desire not to be deceived.
                        --Sissela Bok
0[ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ]0