🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:49:43 GMT, default@easynews.com wrote:

>On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 06:39:44 GMT, felton <felton@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 06:01:20 GMT, default@easynews.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 02:29:51 GMT, slim <pickin's@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>VeggieBurger8 wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> dart@board.net wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> > Dubya and his asshat army of ass licks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> And "intellect" like yours is why Republicans keep winning elections.
>>>>
>>>>"Go fuck youself!" - Dick Cheney
>>>
>>>I dived down several times and tried to save her -Ted Kennedy
>>
>>When was Ted Kennedy president?  As long as we are bringing up
>>relatives of presidents, Laura Bush killed her boyfriend in an auto
>>accident, too.
>
>Did she lie about it?
>
>>>I never had sex with that woman -Bill Clinton
>>
>>Yeah...Clinton got a blow job from an intern.  Bush has screwed the
>>whole country.  
>
>
>SLIME HAS A SOCK
>
>
>>>As for Clinton, he and his "big girl" Attorney General, "The Waco
>>>Kid", are not yet out of the woods by a long shot:
>>>
>>>"More than a year before the 9/11 attacks, Clinton administration
>>>intelligence officials had identified four of the 19 9/11 hijackers as
>>>a terrorist threat - including al-Qaida team leader Mohamed Atta and
>>>his partner Marwan al-Shehhi, whose planes destroyed the World Trade
>>>Center and killed over 2,700 people.
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>Trotting out this tired fable?
>
>The Able Danger question is STILL OUT THERE, fool, and the
>investigation continues...Willie will be swinging in the breeze in a
>skosh. 
>
>>http://mediamatters.org/items/200508230008
>
>Another leftist pig sty. What will you reference next; The Daily
>Worker?

Actually I was referencing the issues being addressed by Sen Slade
Gorton (R-WA), who was a member of the 9/11 Commission as he was
interviewed on the Bill O'Reilly *show*.  Just pointing out that he
refutes all the points you claimed coming out of the Bush
disinformation administration.  

"Gorton made this point unequivocally to O'Reilly. Responding to
O'Reilly's repetition of the suggestion that Gorelick was somehow
responsible for pre-9-11 intelligence failures, Gorton pointed out
that "nothing Jamie Gorelick wrote had the slightest impact on the
Department of Defense or its willingness or ability to share
intelligence information with other intelligence agencies." In
addition, Gorton noted that the wall predated Gorelick and Reno and
was actually "created by laws sponsored by the Church Committee [also
known as the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations
with Respect to Intelligence Activities] back in the 1970s" and "went
all the way through until after 9-11 was over."
 
As far as that "Able Danger" bit, it seems they looked into that as
well.  Remember, this is coming from a "Republican", so it must be
true...

GORTON: What we know on the 9-11 Commission is that he told us nothing
about Mohammed Atta or anyone else in Afghanistan, but he did tell us
about Able Danger. We followed up on Able Danger. We got records about
Able Danger from the Department of Defense. It had nothing about
Mohammed Atta in it.

O'REILLY: OK. And I believe you. I believe you.

You know "default poster", it really isn't all that hard to fact check
these lies and spin and smoke coming out of this administration.  Try
it sometime...if you have any interest in the facts, that is, which I
doubt.