🚀 go-pugleaf

Kurtz wrote:
> <wrcowan1@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
> news:43226978$0$10624$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...
> 
>>
>>slim wrote:
>>
>>>wrcowan1@hal-pc.org wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>slim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>wrcowan1@hal-pc.org wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>slim wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Phil wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 19:58:28 GMT, slim <pickin's@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Phil wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On 5 Sep 2005 23:03:13 -0700, "moorehead"
>>>>>>>>>><moorehead_johnson@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>He was on vacation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>No such thing.  Sorry!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Mike is just upset that Bush wasn't down there from day one,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DOWN THERE FROM DAY ONE!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Doing what?  Throwing sandbags on the levee?  Risking drowning?
> 
> What
> 
>>>>>>>>should the president have done during a hurricane?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I answered your question, you drunkard. Read below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>HE SHOULD HAVE SHOWN COMPASSION AND LEADERSHIP.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Instead, he took two more days on his FIVE WEEK VACATION!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What should he have done while the hurricane was in New Orleans?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mobilize the national Guard, wake Chertoff up and get Homeland
>>>>>>>Security up and ready to respond to an iniment disaster.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The President can not call up or take control of the National Guard
> 
> for
> 
>>>>>>a domestic issue without the Govenors approval or if he were declare
> 
> an
> 
>>>>>>insurrection was occuring.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The problem that occured was between local and federal agencies trying
>>>>>>to decide who was in charge.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The Office of Homeland Security overrides all state and local laws.
>>>>>
>>>>>Was Brown buggering Chertoff while New Orleans drowned?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No, the Office of Homeland security does not override all state and
>>>>local laws.  Its powers are no different than those of the agencies it
>>>>oversees and coordinate.
>>>
>>>
>>>You are wrong.
>>>
>>>Others have posted thier mandate by law.
>>>
>>>In a time of crisis, they are large and in charge...on paper anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>They are in charge of federal dollars that are doled out for rebuilding
>>amd cleanup but that does not mean they take over the state functions.
>>The National guard is under state controls.  HomeLand security can not
>>take control of them.  Homelanad security can not take control of local
>>policing agencies.  Under the direction of Govenor of Lousiana, state
>>troopers and the National Guard keeped people and relief groups and
>>agencies away from New Orleans.
>>
>>
>>MRC
> 
> 
> And who is controlling the BlackWater MERCENARIES as they move through the
> streets of NOLA tonight? Many people will have their 2nd amendment rights
> violated tonight, and because we gave away our 1st amendment rights to
> ShrubCo in the name of Homeland Security, we will not see those who insist
> on their rights on the news tomorrow.
> 
> Enjoy your New World Order, sleepy.
> 
> The Constitution 1787- 2000  R.I.P.


Who are these blackwater Mercenaries?  Have you even investigate who is 
taking the firearms?  It is the City of New Orleans!  Under the guise of 
state law!  So it is not the Feds who are doing it!  You say you are in 
favor of States Rights yet you are protesting a State Action!  The 
Federal Government has not curtailed 1st amendment rights.  They are 
still there.  the only ones who control themedia are the liberl elite! 
That is why you do, as you have put it, "not see those who insist on 
their rights on the news tomorrow."

MRC