🚀 go-pugleaf

Chris wrote:
> <wrcowan1@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
> news:4323ad10$0$10631$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...
> 
>>
>>Chris wrote:
>>
>>><wrcowan1@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
>>>news:4322710f$0$10625$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Chris wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Well considering that now the federal gubment is saying the locals were
>>>>>under water and overwhelmed themselves and they could not handle the
>>>>>evacuation....makes you wonder why they didn't step in if they knew
>>>
>>>this.
>>>
>>>
>>>>FIrst reason is the law.  The Federal Government can not just take over.
>>>
>>>
>>>Not according to the homeland securitydepartment...
>>>
>>
>>Read the law on Homeland security, FEMA and the National Guard.  You
>>will clearly see that they can not just come and take over.
> 
> 
> You read it, I have already....notice the part about a national disaster?
> 

That still does not change the fact that the federal Government can not 
take charge from the State and local officials.  The fact it may called 
a national disaster, only means that aid as spelled out under the 
Staaford Act comes in to play.  Read the Stafford act.

Read these links as Well

Louisiana State Emergency Operations Plan - 2005
http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/plans/STATE%20OF%20LOUISIANA%20EOP%202005.doc

Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation and Sheltering Plan:
http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/plans/EOPSupplement1a.pdf

Southwest Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation and Sheltering Plan:
http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/plans/EOPSupplement1b.pdf

Shelter Plan:
http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/plans/EOPSheltersupplement.pdf

Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as 
amended by Public Law 106-390, October 30, 2000
http://www.fema.gov/library/stafact.shtm#sec501

Federal Response Plan:
http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/plans/frp2003.pdf

> 
>>>>  The Constitution and USC stand in the way.  Inorder to have done it
>>>>was to declare insurrection (which is not was going on in Lousiana).  If
>>>>that was done then the Feds would have controlled the National Guard and
>>>>Federal Troops could step in.  The Second reason is reality.
>>>>Insurrection was last declared during the King Riots of the 1990's but
>>>>that was only after The Govenor of California agreed to have it done.
>>>>It has been a rarely used act  If it were done what do you think the
>>>>headlines would be if a govenor was pushed aside by force and troops
>>>>descending on a majority Black city?
>>>>
>>>>MRC
>>>
>>>
>>>Only two dead in NO?
>>
>>And your point?  YOu have failed to address the Constitutional issues
>>and well as the issues of the USC.
>>
>>MRC
> 
> 
> And you have just kept spinning to try and deflect the sorry ass response by
> bushy and company....to bad it wasn't a horse show, maybe brownie could have
> done a better job with it.

You still have failed to address the Constitutional issues as well as 
the issues dealing with the USC.  Come on do you not have anything 
intellegent to write on the subject?

MRC