🚀 go-pugleaf

>   It must be different where you are.  On the East Coast we have mostly 
>   minorities working in places like Dennies, Bobs Big Boy, etc.  The place
>   in Maryland where the Secret Service agents went to was a very white 
>   area and they knew exactly what they were doing when they went there 
>   because one of the agents had a friend who admitted that they were looking
>   for trouble that day.  In fact, they made a statement to the waiter that
>   they could have the place shut down if they weren't served more quickly.

More power to 'em.  Whether they set up Denny's or not, if Denny's didn't
discriminate, they wouldn't have fallen into the trap.  

If the secret service did plan it, then I congratulate them on doing a
good service to the minorities by putting Denny's in check. 

>   Clearly, the Denny's staff are going to be much more careful about serving
>   minorities more quickly than Whites these days.  I've told my waiter to 
>   serve the people next to me before simply because I knew Denny's was under
>   scrutiny.  He nervously acknowleged with an "I know" and we were on the
>   same wavelength.  But he was also a minority.  Call it self-discrimination
>   if you will.  The white male is getting the bad end of the deal, even 
>   though we pay about 89% of the taxes in this country.  Go figure!

To say that fighting discrimination is wrong because reverse-
discrimination might occur is asanine.  You should fight all
discrimination, and if the system sets up reverse discrimination (like it
does so often), fight that too.  Both forms are clearly wrong, and I
protest both.  You're not helping anyone by supporting reverse-
discrimination the way you did in the above example.  By doing what you
did, you're saying that reverse discrimination is acceptible; okay by you. 

--
Mosh Hard!