🚀 go-pugleaf

On 10/25/2012 6:21 AM, catpandaddy wrote:
>
> "el Dorado" <siete@ciudads.oro> wrote in message
> news:k6ag5s$ms6$2@dont-email.me...
>> On 10/24/2012 8:08 PM, catpandaddy wrote:
>>>
>>> "el Dorado" <siete@ciudads.oro> wrote in message
>>> news:k693f7$qpk$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 10/23/2012 3:30 PM, catpandaddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "el Dorado" <siete@ciudads.oro> wrote in message
>>>>> news:k66mcs$pqo$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> On 4/23/2012 7:02 AM, catpandaddy wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "The Facts" <thefacts@libshatefacts.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:L7E6K3MZ41022.6073263889@reece.net.au...
>>>>>>>> Get your facts right!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get your newsgroup headers right, and take it to the
>>>>>>> politics-specific
>>>>>>> newsgroups. Buh-bye now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who do we blame for this?
>>>>>
>>>>> YOU. For not choosing proper newsgroups for your political tripeshow.
>>>>
>>>> Which newsgroup is improper for discussion on the direction this
>>>> entire nation is about to take?
>>>
>>> All the groups that lack "politics" in the newsgroup hierarchy name.
>>
>> Sorry, the petty syntax vagaries of un-moderated uselessnet groups
>> worry me far less than the looming Obama-led bankruptcy of this nation.
>>
>>> You're welcome.
>>
>> You're not.
>
> I'm not the intruding spammer here.

I'm not terribly taken by your plaintive whining.

> Generally speaking, you are the
> outsider to this newsgroup (and by extension the others)

Oh I'm sorry, is that you pulling rank in a public non-moderated forum?

> and, as you  must know, the outsider does not determine whether the regulars are
> welcome to the group.

What pray tell need I do to be 'welcome' in a _public_ non-moderate forum?

It must be some arcane genuflection....

<shakes head in bemusement>

> The regulars are already here. The regulars
> determine YOUR level of welcomeness. Not vice versa.

They do eh, so when will this sage counsel of "regulars" issue their 
edict, or have you appointed your holy self to demur for them?

> Join our bitbucket now.

Oh lookie, the distinctly non-royal "we" has been invoked.

Golly!

>There are some other trolls in there which you
> may find to be very good company for you.
>
> *plonk*

I'm sure your vivid, id plebeian imagination keeps you good company in 
your sojourns across virtuality.

Meanwhile:


The complete list of faltering or bankrupt green-energy companies:
  1.Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
  2.SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
  3.Solyndra ($535 million)*
  4.Beacon Power ($43 million)*
  5.Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
  6.SunPower ($1.2 billion)
  7.First Solar ($1.46 billion)
  8.Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
  9.EnerDel�s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
  10.Amonix ($5.9 million)
  11.Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
  12.Abound Solar ($400 million)*
  13.A123 Systems ($279 million)*
  14.Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
  15.Johnson Controls ($299 million)
  16.Schneider Electric ($86 million)
  17.Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
  18.ECOtality ($126.2 million)
  19.Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
  20.Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
  21.Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
  22.Olsen�s Crop Service and Olsen�s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 
million)*
  23.Range Fuels ($80 million)*
  24.Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
  25.Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
  26.Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
  27.GreenVolts ($500,000)
  28.Vestas ($50 million)
  29.LG Chem�s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
  30.Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
  31.Navistar ($39 million)
  32.Satcon ($3 million)*
  33.Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
  34.Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)