🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <k6bmfb$ign$1@dont-email.me>, el Dorado <siete@ciudads.oro> writes:
>On 10/25/2012 6:21 AM, catpandaddy wrote:
>> "el Dorado" <siete@ciudads.oro> wrote in message news:k6ag5s$ms6$2@dont-email.me...
>>> On 10/24/2012 8:08 PM, catpandaddy wrote:
>>>> "el Dorado" <siete@ciudads.oro> wrote in message news:k693f7$qpk$2@dont-email.me...

>>>>>>>> politics-specific newsgroups. Buh-bye now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who do we blame for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> YOU. For not choosing proper newsgroups for your political tripeshow.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which newsgroup is improper for discussion on the direction this
>>>>> entire nation is about to take?
>>>>
>>>> All the groups that lack "politics" in the newsgroup hierarchy name.
>>>
>>> Sorry, the petty syntax vagaries of un-moderated uselessnet groups
>>> worry me far less than the looming Obama-led bankruptcy of this nation.
>>>
>>>> You're welcome.
>>>
>>> You're not.
>>
>> I'm not the intruding spammer here.
>
>I'm not terribly taken by your plaintive whining.

Pissing off your intended audience isn't generally a good way to get
them to listen to you. Just sayin'

>> and, as you  must know, the outsider does not determine whether the regulars
>> are welcome to the group.
>
>What pray tell need I do to be 'welcome' in a _public_ non-moderate forum?

There are two options:
1. Only post when you want to say something relevant to the subject
   of the group.
2. Light yourself on fire and die in great agony.

(I don't know the norms of the Oregon, Colorado, Nebraska or Florida
groups. I'm only making this suggestion on behalf of the Minnesota
group.)

-- 
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
Life's too important to take seriously.