Thread View: ott.vietnamese
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Khanh Kim Nguyen
Wed, 07 Oct 1992 15:18
Richness of debate
Author: Khanh Kim Nguyen
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1992 15:18
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1992 15:18
15 lines
981 bytes
981 bytes
Hi, If some of you subscribe to newsgroup * soc.culture.vietnamese * you will regcognize that although it supposes to concentrate on social and culture issues, but that forum shows that you can not single political view out. We cannot separate those three issues which intermingle in our life. Let it go that way to enrich our debate. Back in our homeland, we did not have a chance to put any issue on an operation table. Now with this facility, let it boom . The winners are we. Khanh Kim Nguyen internet : knguyen@emr.ca cc:mail: knguyen@cc2smtp.emr.ca bitnet : knguyen@EMRCAN.BITNET
Re: Richness of debate
Author: H.H. Nguyen
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 23:20
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 23:20
29 lines
1538 bytes
1538 bytes
In article <knguyen-071092110241@knguyen.emr.ca> knguyen@emr.ca (Khanh Kim Nguyen) writes: >Hi, >If some of you subscribe to newsgroup * soc.culture.vietnamese * you will >regcognize that although it supposes to concentrate on social and culture >issues, but that forum shows that you can not single political view out. We >cannot separate those three issues which intermingle in our life. >Let it go that way to enrich our debate. Back in our homeland, we did not >have >a chance to put any issue on an operation table. Now with this facility, >let it >boom . The winners are we. > >Khanh Kim Nguyen >internet : knguyen@emr.ca >cc:mail: knguyen@cc2smtp.emr.ca >bitnet : knguyen@EMRCAN.BITNET Greetings, It seems that you have got one debate in hand already: It is the debate of debating vs non-debating about Quebec, Canada, etc. Looking from another angle, it is using debate, discussion vs. reading, listening to music to address the current constitutional issues. Happy debating ! Or happy book reading, music listening, depending on your personal preferences ! H.H. Nguyen
Re: Richness of debate
Author: Kim Nguyen
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 02:15
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 02:15
23 lines
1574 bytes
1574 bytes
In article <1992Oct9.232047.21140@cunews.carleton.ca> nguyen@turing.scs.carleton.ca (H.H. Nguyen) writes: >In article <knguyen-071092110241@knguyen.emr.ca> knguyen@emr.ca (Khanh Kim Nguyen) writes: >>Hi, >>If some of you subscribe to newsgroup * soc.culture.vietnamese * you will >>regcognize that although it supposes to concentrate on social and culture >>issues, but that forum shows that you can not single political view out. We >>cannot separate those three issues which intermingle in our life. >>Let it go that way to enrich our debate. Back in our homeland, we did not >>have >>a chance to put any issue on an operation table. Now with this facility, >>let it >>boom . The winners are we. >> > It seems that you have got one debate in hand already: It is the >debate of debating vs non-debating about Quebec, Canada, etc. >Looking from another angle, it is using debate, discussion vs. reading, >listening to music to address the current constitutional issues. > > Happy debating ! Or happy book reading, music listening, >depending on your personal preferences ! > --------- Stunned by your posting in alt.vietnam war. It's great.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads