🚀 go-pugleaf

Josh B wrote in message <362B2410.EEE41838@ozemail.com.au>...

Reams of boringly repetitious stuff snipped.

>Ok, let me rephrase the reply to you when you replied to Chris.
>--------------------
>>> As for Josh, if you actually look at the Josh/Rod interactions
>>> you'll find they are almost ALL initiated by Rod. Josh makes
>>> a comment and Rod jumps down his throat.

>> I cant make up my mind if you really do believe this sort of
>> thing or if you know damned well its a lie and claim it anyway.

> Sorry rod, but it's true.

> I have only started about 3 hostile interactions.------------------

Irrelevant to the bit I was pointing out was a lie. And you've
still got the number wrong anyway, and anyone can check that.

>> >>> I have only talked to you in one usenet group.

>>>> That claim is easy to check too. Its wrong.

>>> That is one claim you can NEVER substantiate.

>> Trivial to substantiate actually. Ever heard of DejaNews Josh ?

> Sure have. I have NEVER used more usenet groups than I have said below.

Hang on, irrelevant to the claim about ONE up
there Josh. THATS the claim thats trivial to check.

> You are extremley mistaken.

Nope, and trivial to check that ONE claim Josh.

Keep squirming.

>>> I have only ever posted messages in 9 newsgroups,
>>> 4 of those have been the ozemail.* groups, and one is
>>> the aus.students for which the reference is sighted.

>> Still wrong. Still trivial to check.

> IT IS NOT WRONG. IT IS TOTALLY TRUE.

Not on that claim about you only conversing with me in one Josh.
Shrieking that at the top of your lungs doesnt change a thing.

> If you believe this, then please check.

You think I am silly enough to have not checked already Josh ?

Anyone who can use DejaNews is laughing at your predicament Josh |-)


>>>>> (actually, I have said "would you like a skippy
>>>>> badge haven't I. Oh well, only once)

>>>> Guess again, there are other examples in ozemail.* groups.

>>> Nope,

>> Yep. Only a little harder to check.

>>> I have only said this line twice in any newsgroups,

>> Still wrong. Just like you were wrong when
>> you previously said you only said it once.

> No it's not. Look, this is stupid. I don't believe you are arguing a
> completley wrong point. However, I am not giving up on this point.

Heard of the Rule of Holes Josh ?  When you are in
one STOP DIGGING. Its the only thing that works.

Not much harder for anyone to check that Skippy claim, at least
until you manage to get old messages purged so they cant.