Article View: pdx.general
Article #318Re: Top 10 Conservative Idiots: Top Ten Debate Moments
From: garbaman
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 07:50
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 07:50
313 lines
19047 bytes
19047 bytes
Kind of tough for his wife and daughters to watch the comedy ... "Job Goblin" <jobgoblin@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:f922c367.0410041107.2c2fe36e@posting.google.com... > Top 10 Conservative Idiots: Top Ten Debate Moments > (No. 173) > > October 4, 2004 > Top Ten Debate Moments Edition > > We have a huge list this week which focuses almost entirely > on last week's presidential debate. While expectations were high for > both candidates, nobody quite expected the exquisite thrashing John > Kerry gave George W. Bush for ninety long minutes, and while > post-debate spinners tried their hardest to put lipstick on Bush's pig > of a performance it was quite clear who came out on top. Many of the > links this week are audio clips, so turn your speakers on (or turn > them down if you're at work!), sit back, and enjoy. If you want to > test your system to make sure the audio is working, click this link > first. Also, if you want to watch the debate video or read the > transcript, you can find them both on the C-SPAN website. No key this > week, just enjoy! > > 1 President Kerry vs. Baby Bush > The two candidates hadn't even gotten a word out before John Kerry > stamped his mark of authority on the debate. After moderator Jim > Lehrer's introduction, Bush bounded across the stage in an attempt to > "win the stride" - that is, to get into his opponent's space and > intimidate him, as Ronald Reagan did so effectively to Jimmy Carter in > 1980. > > Unfortunately it backfired when tiny Bush ran smack into man-mountain > John Kerry, who pulled Bush in close to contrast the height difference > between them. Kerry leaned down to whisper in Bush's ear, leading to > the first great moment of the debate - Bush literally having to tear > his hand out of Kerry's grip before retreating all the way back across > the stage to his podium. > > Hilarity ensued as TV cameras put up a split-screen of the two > candidates, artificially raising the height of Bush's podium so their > heads were level. And while Kerry looked like he was standing behind a > podium, Bush unfortunately looked like he was sitting in a highchair. > > > 2 Mexed Missages > It honestly appeared that George W. Bush's only preparation for the > debate was to repeat the phrase "mixed signals" and "mixed messages" > over and over again in front of a mirror. Funny thing is, when it came > to the crunch he even fucked that up, at one point accusing Kerry of > sending "mexed missages." > > The purpose of all this, was, of course, to paint Kerry as indecisive. > See, according to Bush, you can't be a strong leader if for one second > you stop to consider your options. Staying the course is always > preferable to discussing alternatives, even if that course is leading > you towards the edge of a very tall cliff. > > In fact, it's absolutely preferable to drive off that cliff - as long > as you're resolute and steadfast while you're doing it. Unfortunately > this gambit failed dismally as Kerry came across far steadier and > stronger during the debate than Bush, who looked wobbly, defensive, > and weak. Oh well. > > 3 Mexed Missages, Part Two > But let nobody ever accuse Bush of being inflexible! See, while Kerry > maintained strong and consistent positions throughout the debate, Bush > appeared to be making up new policies as he went along. > > First, he took on Kerry's suggestion that it would probably help the > United States if the rest of the world thought we were credible. While > rambling on about the International Criminal Court - which he actually > appeared to be quite frightened of - Bush said, "I just think trying > to be popular, kind of, in the global sense, if it's not in our best > interest makes no sense." > > This, of course, was after Bush had spent a good portion of time > boasting about the "alliances" that he had put together with the > United Kingdom, Australia, and, uh, that's it. Oh - Poland. I almost > forgot about Poland. So which is it, Mr. President? Making sure we > have strong alliances by ensuring that we remain credible in the eyes > of the world? Or making sure we have strong alliances by not giving a > damn about our credibility? Make your mind up. > > But that wasn't all - Bush also insisted that Iraqi president Ayad > Allawi "doesn't want U.S. leadership ... to send mixed signals, to not > stand with the Iraqi people." But then, after yet another verbal > thrashing from Kerry about the perils of blind certainty, Bush changed > his mind. In fact, you might say he... flip-flopped. "I fully agree > that one should shift tactics, and we will, in Iraq." He said. Oh, we > will? Gee, don't tell Ayad Allawi. He doesn't want U.S. Leadership to > send mixed signals. > > 4 Excuses, Excuses, Excuses > The debate gave Bush a splendid opportunity to come up with yet > another new excuse for why the war in Iraq is not exactly a success. > And it's a good one! See, apparently we achieved victory too quickly. > > "Because we achieved such a rapid victory, more of the Saddam > loyalists were around," said Our Great Leader. "In other words, we > thought we'd whip more of them going in. But because Tommy Franks did > such a great job in planning the operations, we moved rapidly. And a > lot of the Ba'athists and Saddam loyalists laid down their arms and > disappeared. I thought we would - they would stay and fight. But they > didn't. And now we're fighting them now." > > Now we're fighting them now, indeed. Mind you, it's odd that Bush > thought they would stay and fight, considering that just last week CNN > reported that "Two classified reports prepared for President Bush two > months before the Iraq invasion warned the war could prompt an > insurgency in which rogue elements from Saddam Hussein's government > would work with existing terrorist groups, sources said." > > Want more? "The January 2003 reports from the National Intelligence > Council (NIC) said an invasion would increase support for hard-line > politicized Islam and result in a divided Iraqi society prone to > violent conflict, the sources said Tuesday." > > Don't blame Bush though. It's not his fault if he didn't read those > reports. > > 5 A New Leash on Life > "I appreciate enormously the personal comments the president just > made," said John Kerry after Bush grudgingly praised his character, > > "And I share them with him. I think only if you're doing this - and > he's done it more than I have in terms of the presidency - can you > begin to get a sense of what it means to your families. And it's > tough. And so I acknowledge that his daughters - I've watched them. > I've chuckled a few times at some of their comments. And..." > > Suddenly Bush interrupted, "I'm trying to put a leash on them." > > > 6 Crusaderiffic > One of Bush's very last lines of the night was also one of his most > interesting: "We've climbed the mighty mountain. I see the valley > below, and it's a valley of peace." The simplest explanation for > Bush's sudden eloquence can probably be boiled down to: "Hey world, > you listening? We're up here, you're down there. Suck on it." > > But that doesn't sound quite right. A possible suggestion is that Bush > was referring to Martin Luther King's "mountaintop" speech, where Dr. > King said, "I just want to do God's will. And He's allowed me to go up > to the mountain. And I've looked over. And I've seen the promised > land." But let's face it, the chances of Bush deliberately > paraphrasing the nation's greatest civil rights leader are slimmer > than a supermodel on a hunger strike. > > No, the best guess may be that the mighty mountain Bush was talking > about is the Biblical mountain God took Moses up, just before Moses > picked Joshua to lead the Israelites into the promised land. > Incidentally, Joshua was a military leader who kicked a whole lot of > nonbeliever ass, and the book of Joshua is widely cited as a > justification for the Crusades. Oh yes, you know the fundies liked > that one! > > 7 Bringing Them To Justice > In his very first rebuttal, Bush bragged that "the A.Q Khan network > has been brought to justice." For those of you not familiar with A.Q > Khan, he's a Pakistani nuclear physicist who back in February of this > year admitted to exporting nuclear secrets to Iran, North Korea, and > Libya. > > Want to know how the Bush administration brought Khan to justice? > Well, after owning up to his crimes, he was pardoned by President > Musharraf. A month later, during a visit to Islamabad, Colin Powell > designated Pakistan a major non-NATO ally - which allows them to > purchase a wide array of U.S. weaponry - and refused to criticize > Musharraf for letting Khan off the hook. > > Why? According to the New Republic (or see Idiots 163), because the > Bush administration was at the time putting heavy pressure on Pakistan > to capture or kill "High Value Targets" - Al Qaeda leaders - before > the election. Specifically, "it would be best if the arrest or killing > of [any] HVT were announced on twenty-six, twenty-seven, or > twenty-eight July." > > Those dates, of course, happily coincided with the Democratic National > Convention. > > So now you know how the Bush administration brought A.Q. Khan to > justice - by letting him go free so that the Pakistani government > would announce terrorist captures on dates which were politically > convenient for George W. Bush. > > Fortunately, even the Bush administration couldn't be this brazen, and > the plan never came to fruition. Well, unless you count Pakistan's > subsequent capture of a top Al Qaeda terrorist, which just happened to > be announced the day of John Kerry's acceptance speech at the > Convention. But that was probably just a coincidence. > > 8 The Seven Faces of Bush > Those who watched Bush vs. Kerry on C-SPAN were able to enjoy non-stop > split-screen action for the duration of the debate. This gave viewers > an opportunity to concentrate on the body language of each candidate > while the other was speaking. > > While most casual viewers thought that Bush appeared to go from > annoyance to chagrin to peevishness and back to annoyance, experts > have agreed that Bush's facial expressions actually passed through > seven distinct, recognizable changes during the course of the debate. > > 9 Not This Time, Bucko > Of course, the biggest news of the night came when George W. Bush > acknowledged that - hold on to your hats - he knows who attacked > America on 9/11! Of course, he needed a bit of prompting from Senator > Kerry, but there you go. > > Ever since 9/11 the Bush administration has done all it can to confuse > the war on terror with the war in Iraq, and Osama bin Laden with > Saddam Hussein. This might have worked on the lazy mainstream media, > who happily drilled it into the minds of the American people for two > years, but it wasn't going to work on John Kerry. > > When Jim Lehrer asked Bush about more preemptive military actions, > Bush waffled about Iraq and then foolishly threw in his favorite piece > of campaign spin: "I understand how hard it is to commit troops. Never > wanted to commit troops. When I was running - when we had the debate > in 2000, never dreamt I'd be doing that. But the enemy attacked us, > Jim, and I have a solemn duty to protect the American people." > > Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. > > "Jim, the president just said something extraordinarily revealing and > frankly very important in this debate," responded Kerry. "In answer to > your question about Iraq and sending people into Iraq, he just said, > 'The enemy attacked us.' Saddam Hussein didn't attack us. Osama bin > Laden attacked us. Al Qaida attacked us. And when we had Osama bin > Laden cornered in the mountains of Tora Bora, 1,000 of his cohorts > with him in those mountains. With the American military forces nearby > and in the field, we didn't use the best trained troops in the world > to go kill the world's number one criminal and terrorist." > > Well, you could have used Bush to clandestinely open an envelope, he > was steaming so much. And when Kerry was done, Bush barged in for a 30 > second rebuttal - his mouth running way, way ahead of his brain. "Of > course I know Osama bin Laden attacked us," he fumed. Then, realizing > how ridiculous he sounded, he trailed off with a lame, "I know that." > > I almost felt sorry for the poor guy. It can't be a nice feeling, > having your ass handed to you in front of 60 million people. > > 10 Work Hard With A Vengeance > If there's one thing we found out last Thursday, it's that the > presidency is hard work. So much hard work, in fact, that Bush used > the phrase eleven times during the debate. I guess this must be why > Bush spent 42% of his first eight months in office on vacation - I > mean, he was even on vacation when he got that Presidential Daily > Briefing entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in United States." > But, you know, Dubya was clearing brush that day, and clearing brush > is, well, hard work. > > It's odd, but from his statements during the debate it almost sounded > like being president is simply too much of a pain in the ass for > George W. Bush. Turning Iraq from a tyranny to a democracy is "hard > work." Training Iraqi troops is "hard work." Having the FBI director > come in his office and talk about security every morning is "hard > work." Climbing the mighty mountain and seeing the valley below is > "hard work." Trying to love Missy Johnson as best as he can is "hard > work." > > We get it already! Being president is hard work! You don't have to > keep whining on and on about it! It comes with the territory! Didn't > you realize that it was going to be hard work before you applied for > the job the first time? What, do you want us to feel sorry for you? > Suck it up! > > The Best of the Rest > George W. Bush obviously wasn't the only Conservative Idiot of the > week. Colin Powell was sending mixed messages; Pennsylvania > Republicans were lying their asses off; Team Bush has outsourced its > voter file database; and Jerry Falwell says that evangelical > Christians now control the Republican party. Hang on, that's not > idiocy - he's right. > > Meanwhile, Ken Blackwell, Ohio's secretary of state, has been trying > to suppress voter registration; Arnold Schwarzenegger (despite being a > smoker himself) has banned smoking in California's prisons on health > grounds (oh well, there's always heroin); Jim Bunning lied about his > endorsements, and CNN and the Miami Herald allowed Republicans to pose > as "undecided voters" during their post-debate coverage. > > Elsewhere, Fox News had to pull TWO stories from their website when > they were discovered to be fake - one story was about a website called > "Communists for Kerry" which is run by Republicans (Fox reported as if > it were a real organization), and the other was a spoof article by > Fox's own Carl Cameron, who simply invented a bunch of Kerry quotes. > Not that anyone cares about holding Fox News accountable. > > While I'm on the subject, anyone in the media who called the debate a > draw can kiss my ass - I mean, come on. These reports of a "draw" were > frequently sitting right next to voter polls which favored Kerry > 80%-20% over Bush. > > And finally, (yes, finally!) let's end with some sex. Antonin Scalia > announced last week that "sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and > ought to be encouraged." So that's what he was doing in that duck > blind with Dick Cheney! See you next week! > > > Linked cites verifying the aforementioned idiots can be found at: > http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/index.html > _____________________________________________________________________ > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > "The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our > number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." > ~ George Bush Jr. 2001-09-13 > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > "I don't know where he (bin Laden) is. I have no idea and I really > don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." > ~ George Bush Jr. 2002-03-13 > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > FLIP/FLOP\FLIP/FLOP\FLIP/FLOP\FLIP/FLOP\FLIP/FLOP\FLIP/FLOP\FLIP
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<WaSdnT6c-fYgPv7cRVn-oQ@comcast.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<f922c367.0410041107.2c2fe36e@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1128d6,3addd2fce9b4ab88 X-Google-Thread: 1084c1,3addd2fce9b4ab88 X-Google-Thread: fa3bd,3addd2fce9b4ab88 X-Google-Thread: 107959,3addd2fce9b4ab88 X-Google-Thread: 1098dc,3addd2fce9b4ab88 X-Google-Attributes: gid1128d6,gid1084c1,gidfa3bd,gid107959,gid1098dc,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 02:50:21 -0500 Reply-To: "garbaman" <garbaman@hotmoil.com> From: "garbaman" <garbaman@hotmoil.com> Newsgroups: pdx.general,az.general,stl.general,pgh.general,miami.general References: <f922c367.0410041107.2c2fe36e@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: Top 10 Conservative Idiots: Top Ten Debate Moments Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 03:50:30 -0400 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-ID: <WaSdnT6c-fYgPv7cRVn-oQ@comcast.com> Lines: 315 NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.171.78.57 X-Trace: sv3-irUR+97n9iOq53lqOJrrREcaME95+sV+N2su8kNKtYkUwimJraAFSOg1H95VUxw4TKgjz/x+cJP8KP9!EgAbQyoCSidPy/YPXEsLUmWuO4h5WJtVvvhXG9FFdh8E4qOxGdh0wCsDtzSl X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.19