🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi all!

In article <447krf$4fe@shellx.best.com>, richard@shellx.best.com (Richard Bennett) writes:
|> Jon SoAL Bazinet (bazinj@cii3116-18.its.rpi.edu) wrote:
|> 
|> : Hey, hey.  Im not looking to get "laid" --i dont like the term either-- now.
|> : I am seeking friendship.  If it develops any further, good.  If it doesnt,
|> : that is also good.  Im recovering from a dysfunctional family and, thus,
|> : approaching the social scene in a healthy manner: one step at a time.  I am
|> : NOT going to push it along any faster.
|> 
|> Excellent post, Jon - you've got all the essential elements of "Sensitive
|> Guy" on display here, and in fine form - the anal vocabulary, the Platonic
|> aspiration, the cautious, "boss me baby" attitude about advancing the
|> relationship, and, best of all, the "pity me I'm dysfunctional" closer.

Rich, i am not seeking pity or a bossy woman, i am stating fact and
indicating i dont boss anyone.  These ideas are the kinds of dysfunctional
notions i have already worked out of my system.  If someone decides to pity
me, thats their problem.  If someone wants to control or manipulate me, i
will ask her(or him) to stop, and if it persists i will end the relationship.
And thanks for the "Sensitive Guy" compliment.

<some ranting deleted>
|> And perhaps she will prefer somebody like Bradshaw, who, after all, has
|> some bucks.

If money was the most important thing to her, i wouldnt want her.
Too shallow.
If someone else does, thats his/her perogative(sp?).

My point:
SEX does not equal LOVE, happiness, intimacy, peace.

Oh, and one more thing.  Id appreciate it if everyone try not to label me
with their individual assuptions.  Good probability it wont stick.

later world,
---
Jon Bazinet
bazinj@rpi.edu
I have no answers, no beliefs, only weird theories and too many questions :)