🚀 go-pugleaf

In message <43s259$atk@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> - janiceg@Eng.Sun.COM (Janice Gelb
) writes:
:>
:>In article <43qeud$lvg@news.voicenet.com>, ktappe@omni.voicenet.com (Kurt Tappe) writes:
:>>
:>>I don't buy this at all.  The skills needed to date and the skills needed
:>>to maintain a relationship are VERY different; as different as the skills
:>>needed to run a political campaign vs. those needed to actually serve in
:>>office.  As has been shown in recent years, those good at one end are
:>>often bad at the other.  I think I'd be excellent in a long-term
:>>relationship / marriage.  I just suck at meeting women / dating.  The
:>>former involves dedication, understanding, and sharing.  The latter
:>>involves dancing, drinking, and trying to impress someone in two minutes.
:>>
:>
:>Well, shoot, no wonder I've never gotten the hang of this dating thing:
:>here I've been thinking all this time that it involved getting to know
:>another person while engaging in some mutually enjoyable social
:>activity...
:>
No it's not. Why was being discussed is meeting the person. There is
a need to convice the other person you are worth the time to actually 
to get to be known. It's like getting a job, the resume only gets you the 
interview. You could also get the interview otherways. Being in a mutually 
enjoyable social activity will reduce the "cost" of the other person getting 
to know you.



--------------------------
bills@microsys.com
Just think no to stupdity!
--------------------------