Article View: pnw.general
Article #658Re: the debates
From: Tracy Monaghan
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 16:16
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 16:16
15 lines
1010 bytes
1010 bytes
In article <3145@voodoo.UUCP> howie@voodoo.boeing.com (howie) writes: > > >CNN is reporting that the debating experts from Oxford University rated the >three participants as follows: > > Perot: was the clear cut winner > Bush: did "so so" > Clinton: failed miserably > > Now that's weird. UPI reported that debate judges, scoring the debates using the criteria for 'regular' debates, had Clinton the clear winner in (if memory serves me) 8 out of 10 categories, Perot winning two categories, and Bush zero.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct13.161600.6499@u.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!monaghanReferences:
<MS-C.718850250.1103527590.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM> <3144@voodoo.UUCP> <3145@voodoo.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!monaghan From: monaghan@cac.washington.edu (Tracy Monaghan ) Newsgroups: pnw.general Subject: Re: the debates Message-ID: <1992Oct13.161600.6499@u.washington.edu> Date: 13 Oct 92 16:16:00 GMT Article-I.D.: u.1992Oct13.161600.6499 References: <MS-C.718850250.1103527590.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM> <3144@voodoo.UUCP> <3145@voodoo.UUCP> Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System) Organization: UW Computing Lines: 15