🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH@gibdo.engr.washington.edu> bobk@gibdo.engr.washington.edu (Bob) writes:
>Mark Crispin <mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM> writes:
>|
>| The big winner was Perot.  He was fantastic.  I don't think he's going to be
>
>  Perot, in contrast, was a breath of fresh air.  He stuck to the issues,
>  and talked straight, and more importantly, he talked sense.
>
>  I'm going for Perot.  I wasn't happy with his quitting the race,

Granted, Perot made the most sense. But, just let him try to impose the subsidy
reductions, tax increases, and changes to the status quo that he proposes.
Neither the American power structure nor the American public
would stand for it. At best he'd be impeached on some trumped-up charge. At
worst he'd be assinated.

Kennedy also threatened the status quo, and see what happened to him.

Americans like to hear gutsy toughtalk, as long as it doesn't apply
to them!

Mike