Article View: pnw.general
Article #703Re: the debates
From: Robert Reed
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 20:13
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 20:13
15 lines
1368 bytes
1368 bytes
In article <1992Oct15.192047.2007@kopachuk.uucp> dcb@kopachuk.uucp (David Breneman) writes:
Just out of curiosity, what don't you like about Stockdale? I didn't
see the whole debate, but the part I saw didn't leave me with the
impression that he was any worse than the others. Just because
someone isn't a polished (some would say slick :-) ) orator
doesn't mean they aren't gifted in other areas. In fact, if all
a person *can* do is look good in public, then they are probably
lacking in other skills. Stockdale is a respected member of a
think-tank and the author of several books, so he can't be a
doddering old fool.
What bothered me about Stockdale was the number of times that he either didn't
have an opinion on a subject and showed that he hadn't really thought about it,
or that his position comprised a rambling collection of unfocused thoughts.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bw8DIt.FC9@slipknot.rain.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tessi!eaglet!slipknot!robertReferences:
<3760@master.CNA.TEK.COM> <SCOTT.92Oct14094724@arugula.statsci.com> <1992Oct15.192047.2007@kopachuk.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: pnw.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tessi!eaglet!slipknot!robert From: robert@slipknot.rain.com (Robert Reed) Subject: Re: the debates Message-ID: <Bw8DIt.FC9@slipknot.rain.com> Reply-To: robert@slipknot.rain.com.UUCP (Robert Reed) Organization: Home Animation Ltd. References: <3760@master.CNA.TEK.COM> <SCOTT.92Oct14094724@arugula.statsci.com> <1992Oct15.192047.2007@kopachuk.uucp> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 20:13:40 GMT Lines: 15