🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <343e5849.185010728@news1.vir.com>, mm <atp@*nospam*.vir.com> wrote:
>
>This shouldn't be a requirement.  Your insecurity should not be the
>motivation surrounding their actions.   The only fair interpretation
>will be based on their actions, not on their lack of response to
>various demands you feel are just because they make you feel insecure.

They're perfectly free not to issue any statement at all.  I'm just
telling you what statement they'll need to issue in order to impress me.

>>McCartney describes this relationship, at "best," as one where the man
>>makes the decisions, taking his wife's feelings and desires into account,
>>but not being bound by them.  The wife abides by the husband's decision,
>>even if she disagrees with it.  
>>
>>Of course, the question I'd like McCartney to answer is what this
>>marriage looks like when the PKer comes home and announces he's taking
>>back his leadership and his wife tells him she's not willing to follow.
>>
>From what I read the PKer comes home and requests the right to take
>back part of his responsibility.  It was always 'request' and never
>'demand'.
>
>This also implies that the PKer is not the ruler of the house.  Rules
>tell, they don't ask.

I see.  It must have been Tony Evan's statement, "I am not suggesting
that you ask for your role back, I am urging you to take it back.  There
can be no compromise here." that thew me.  Even on review, it sounds like
telling, not asking.

>By this practice you have your answer, but I'm sure it will not be
>enough.  It never is, is it.

It would be, if it didn't conflict with the statements that have come
from the PKs own speakers.
-- 
Daniel B. Holzman -- Love does not subtract, it multiplies. -- All acts of love 
and pleasure are Her rituals. -- An it Harm none, do what you Will. -- They
took my name and stole my heritage, but they didn't get my goat. --  The
word is all of us. -- Remember the Twelth Commandment and keep it Wholly.