Article View: rci.general
Article #116Re: NOW challenge to PK
From: Tracy Hornschuch
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 00:00
43 lines
2852 bytes
2852 bytes
On 10 Oct 1997, Scott A.Renner wrote: > >>>>> At 23:37 10/9, holzman@xochi.tezcat.com (Daniel B. Holzman) said: > > > > Of course, the question I'd like McCartney to answer is what this > > marriage looks like when the PKer comes home and announces he's taking > > back his leadership and his wife tells him she's not willing to follow. > > I'd like to see the official answer to this question myself. > > The bottom line has to be this: if she truly won't follow, then she doesn't > have to. He has no way to compel her; he can only persuade. Indeed, all > of the legal forms of coercion are effectively reserved to her. She can > tell him to change, or be divorced; she keeps his children and his > paycheck, he's out in the cold. He can make no such credible threat. > > I don't imagine that PK spends much time discussing this worst-case > scenario, in part because it doesn't often arise. It appears that the > great majority of PK wives *like* the new arrangement. Scott, Two questions for you... 1) are you a Promise Keeper? 2) if so then are you admitting that the Promise Keepers are telling their wives that they are taking about their leadership in the household? If so then this is telling women that they must follow their husbands and do what they are told. And then marriages wouldn't be that two-way road anymore. Tracy browntr@engr.orst.edu | tracyh@teleport.COM http://www.engr.orst.edu/~browntr/ | http://www.teleport.com/~tracyh/ I would like to find a man who wants | Have you told your children to be married and a father for life. | you love them today? "The only safe computer is a dead computer"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.SUN.3.96.971010084108.20618B-100000@flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61g8vn$4jr@xochi.tezcat.com> <61j5qb$lia$3@gail.ripco.com> <61kbf5$dou@xochi.tezcat.com> <19971010151343.28750.qmail@nym.alias.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5de8,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5de8,public X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public X-Google-Thread: 15f5e3,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid15f5e3,public X-Google-Thread: fe6e4,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe6e4,public X-Google-Thread: 115ded,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid115ded,public X-Google-Thread: 10e835,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public From: Tracy Hornschuch <browntr@engr.orst.edu> Subject: Re: NOW challenge to PK Date: 1997/10/10 Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.971010084108.20618B-100000@flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU> X-Deja-AN: 279388232 References: <61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61g8vn$4jr@xochi.tezcat.com> <61j5qb$lia$3@gail.ripco.com> <61kbf5$dou@xochi.tezcat.com> <19971010151343.28750.qmail@nym.alias.net> Organization: Network for Education and Research in Oregon Newsgroups: rci.general,chi.media,chi.general,alt.feminism,soc.women,soc.men,alt.politics.liberalism