🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Pine.SUN.3.96.971011023441.17564A-100000@flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU>,
Tracy Hornschuch <browntr@engr.orst.edu> wrote:

>On Sat, 11 Oct 1997, Blair Zajac wrote:
>
>> In article <Pine.SUN.3.96.971010084108.20618B-100000@flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU>,
>> Tracy Hornschuch <browntr@engr.orst.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> >If so then this is telling women that they must follow their husbands and
>> >do what they are told.  And then marriages wouldn't be that two-way road
>> >anymore.
>> >
>> 
>> Perhaps Tracy put her finger on why there are so many failed marriages. The
>> feminists think that marriage is a two way road. 
>> 
>> A valid, stable marriage is where both spouses go the same way on any road.
>
>Blair,
>
>This is the best you can come up with?  You are not worth my time.  The
>funny thing about you and I... we're both NOT feminists.  And I have
>nothing wrong with your view, but you have a problem with mine.
>
>A two-way road implies meeting each other somewhere in the middle.  There
>will always, regardless of who you are and what you believe, be
>disagreements in a marriage.  Always.  You cannot tell me that you and
>your husband (if you are married) don't have arguements.
>
>
>Tracy
>


For my self, I don't want to meet anyone in the middle of a two way road.
It is a good way to get killed.

Regarding the matter of arguements, of course I have them with my wife. But
they are based on the matter of how we go down the road in the same
direction, not in opposite directions.

I appreciate your taking the time to respond, even though I am apparently
not worth your time. :)

-- 
Zajac says, 'Laws are like paper money -- they are only valid as long as
people have faith in them.'

bzajac@tcsn.net