Article View: rci.general
Article #147Re: The Correct Challenge (WAS: Re: NOW challenge to PK)
From: Gary Paul Sarsok
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 00:00
64 lines
3738 bytes
3738 bytes
It is truly typical that some can not even quote the Bible without selective editing... Ephesians 5: 21, (The first sentence which you conviently left out), says .. Submit yourselves to one another because of your reverence for Christ. Changes the whole context. On 8 Oct 1997 10:58:21 -0500, holzman@xochi.tezcat.com (Daniel B. Holzman) wrote: >:}In article <61eh5k$cm5$1@Mars.mcs.net>, Karl Denninger <karl@MCS.COM> wrote: >:}> >:}>>but maybe just >:}>>maybe they are seeing them as a group of men who want to make women >:}>>subservient. >:}> >:}>Again, the Gospel (if you believe in such) is rather clear on the truth of >:}>this matter. >:} >:}It sure is... >:} >:}Ephesians 5:22-28 (KJV) >:} >:}"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the >:}Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the >:}head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the >:}church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands >:}in every thing. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved >:}the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse >:}it with the washing of water by the word, That he might present it to >:}himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; >:}but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love their >:}wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself." >:} >:}Exactly how can this be taken as anything except an hierarchical >:}arrangement with the husband dominant and wife submissive? [Hint: The >:}fact that the husband is being called to be a good ruler reinforces this >:}notion of the hierarchical arrangement, it does not refute it.] >:} >:}>Why don't we talk about divorce in this context.... How do you end up in >:}>divorce court if you're a PKer? >:} >:}Oh, that's easy. You tell your wife you're "taking back" your role as >:}leader, just like McCartney wants you to. Your wife then tells you she's >:}not having any of that, and files for divorce if you continue to insist on >:}"taking back" your role as leader. >:} >:}-- >:}Daniel B. Holzman -- Love does not subtract, it multiplies. -- All acts of love >:}and pleasure are Her rituals. -- An it Harm none, do what you Will. -- They >:}took my name and stole my heritage, but they didn't get my goat. -- The >:}word is all of us. -- Remember the Twelth Commandment and keep it Wholly. ..gary... Pax Tecum Kde vira tam laska. Kde laska tam mir. PGP Key:8E16 8188 07B8 B99A 5AA4 2580 0AB0 19CC F1B8 EC49
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<343c2006.32865919@news1.ibm.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61e92e$7id$1@Mars.mcs.net> <Pine.SUN.3.96.971007145528.3025A-100000@flop.engr.orst.edu> <61eh5k$cm5$1@Mars.mcs.net> <61gaiu$5dl@xochi.tezcat.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e835,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public X-Google-Thread: 115ded,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid115ded,public X-Google-Thread: f5de8,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5de8,public X-Google-Thread: 15f5e3,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid15f5e3,public X-Google-Thread: fe6e4,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe6e4,public X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public From: sarsok@ibm.net (Gary Paul Sarsok) Subject: Re: The Correct Challenge (WAS: Re: NOW challenge to PK) Date: 1997/10/09 Message-ID: <343c2006.32865919@news1.ibm.net> X-Deja-AN: 278836000 References: <61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61e92e$7id$1@Mars.mcs.net> <Pine.SUN.3.96.971007145528.3025A-100000@flop.engr.orst.edu> <61eh5k$cm5$1@Mars.mcs.net> <61gaiu$5dl@xochi.tezcat.com> Newsgroups: rci.general,chi.media,chi.general,alt.feminism,soc.women,soc.men,alt.politics.liberalism