🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <61e92e$7id$1@Mars.mcs.net>, Karl Denninger <karl@MCS.COM> wrote:
>
>But does that justify NOW's position that women should be able to make 
>false accusations without facing legal penalty for doing so IN COURT 
>AND UNDER OATH?  Of course, such license is not to be granted to men
>under any circumstances!
>
>Or their position that judges which don't conform to their view of women
>being the only fit parents should be removed from the bench?
>
>I could go on - but if you're truly interested, its all published on their
>web site.  You don't even have to look hard to find their treatises and
>"alerts" on how "dangerous" it is that father's rights organizations

Gee, Karl, I just checked their web sites and didn't find a single
statement supporting the idea that it is their posiution that "women
should be able to make false accusations without facing legal penalty for
doing so IN COURT AND UNDER OATH..."  I don't suppose you've got a
reference for that that's just a teeny bit more specific?

-- 
Daniel B. Holzman -- Love does not subtract, it multiplies. -- All acts of love 
and pleasure are Her rituals. -- An it Harm none, do what you Will. -- They
took my name and stole my heritage, but they didn't get my goat. --  The
word is all of us. -- Remember the Twelth Commandment and keep it Wholly.