Article View: rci.general
Article #217Re: The Correct Challenge (WAS: Re: NOW challenge to PK)
From: Tracy Hornschuch
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 00:00
72 lines
4506 bytes
4506 bytes
On 7 Oct 1997, Karl Denninger wrote: [snipped] > > You have a million men assemble in our nation's capital to do only ONE > thing -- pray to God on their knees in the heart of the nation -- and > all the media covers is all the people who see something sinister in > a group of men making the sign of the cross! I don't think that people are seeing the PKs as sinister, but maybe just maybe they are seeing them as a group of men who want to make women subservient. Now before anyone goes off on a tangent let's take a look at why... Most churches teach women their *roles* in society. These roles are are to stay at home and raise the kids. To take care of their husband. Heck, it is stated in the vowes when they are married. So there are many people, both men and women, who do not feel that this is correct... Is can and has caused problems in the history of humankind. Let's take a look at some things that are happening in society today. How about divorse. So one of these PKs end up in divorse court.... They find thenselves facing a woman who they thought they married, but she's changed. Instead of making him dinner she now wants the house, the kids, child-support, and because she stayed at home throughout the marriage... she wants allomony. Hum... this has happened to a friend of mine. We almost got married, but didn't 'cause I wouldn't stay at home... Now where does this leave this man and this woman? And what about the kids? You can't blaim NOW for men's problems in court when there are wanting a wife to stay at home and raising the kids. You can't. In fact you should be thanking NOW for trying to get more women in the work force. I mean really now... I thought there were some men who did want to stay at home while their wife worked. Another big problem that many people have with the PKs is why Christianity? Personally I have no problem with the PKs. I think it is great that there are men out there in this world who want to make promises along the lines of fatherhood and husbandhood. But why Christianity? There are many other religions in the world that preach basically the same thing. Why couldn't the PKs be just about making the promise to themselves, their wives, and society. Why bring God into it? Why is it that these men need an excuss to make this promis? If the PKs were less religious if not none at all, then I would support them more. If not totally. But I cannot support such an organization that doesn't support human rights as a whole. I don't support the NOW organization 'cause it seems to want to bash men constantly and expects too much. Personally I support single income families... something the NOW organization would find bad 'cause most people will assume that this means women must stay at home. I support overall human rights. Everyone's! It shouldn't matter if you're Christian or not. It shouldn't matter if you're woman or man. It shouldn't matter what color your skin is. Tracy browntr@engr.orst.edu | tracyh@teleport.COM http://www.engr.orst.edu/~browntr/ | http://www.teleport.com/~tracyh/ I would like to find a man who wants | Have you told your children to be married and a father for life. | you love them today? "The only safe computer is a dead computer"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.SUN.3.96.971007145528.3025A-100000@flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61dv8k$smt$1@Mars.mcs.net> <61e5p1$e9a@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com> <61e92e$7id$1@Mars.mcs.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe6e4,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe6e4,public X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public X-Google-Thread: f5de8,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5de8,public X-Google-Thread: 115ded,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid115ded,public X-Google-Thread: 10e835,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public X-Google-Thread: 15f5e3,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid15f5e3,public From: Tracy Hornschuch <browntr@engr.orst.edu> Subject: Re: The Correct Challenge (WAS: Re: NOW challenge to PK) Date: 1997/10/07 Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.971007145528.3025A-100000@flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU> X-Deja-AN: 278525197 References: <61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61dv8k$smt$1@Mars.mcs.net> <61e5p1$e9a@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com> <61e92e$7id$1@Mars.mcs.net> Organization: Network for Education and Research in Oregon Newsgroups: rci.general,chi.media,chi.general,alt.feminism,soc.women,soc.men,alt.politics.liberalism