🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.audio.misc
Article #17

Re: Best Recordable Port'MD Player?

#17
From: Tetsuya Nagae
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 00:00
29 lines
2650 bytes
Anthony Curran wrote:
>                                                                  the
> current generation MD's are using 20 bits and if you read the article
> in electronics australia (Oct 96?) regarding the review of the JA3es
> then the guy doing the review put MD ahead of DAT after reviewing the
>  MD recorder in question

 I think MD is nice equipment for easy use. This is good system "Walkman" 
listners. 

 And I know new ATRAC IC has "20bit".
 But this "20bit" means "interface bit-bus has 20bit"
 The ATRAC algorithm has time-domain areas coding and floating point 
quantization system. So it is not same liner 20bit PCM resorution. 
 Please record 2 or 3 multi-tones at same time, bitween near frequency.

 By the way, some professional recording engineer said "24bit recording".
 They are using "the 24bit interface A/D converter", so this recording 
means 24bit recording. If it is correct, please using 64bit-bus DSP. 
Please use 64bit output decimation filtering circuit.
 Some people says "Oh!! 64bit recording it is great!" (^o^)/

 But if you round-off 64bit data to CD's 16bit with no dither, you can hear 
great sound.(@_@)?  Please don't use High bit A/Dconverter with no dither.
I do not like q-noise. 
                                                             Tetsuya Nagae
                                                      Audio tech-resercher
 p.s   I am sorry to write wrong spelling.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <32DAF217.2D30@fsinet.or.jp>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <Pine.OSF.3.91.970110151227.22197G-100000@godiva> <32d8399a.2908168@news.uwa.edu.au> <32DB00BC.15FB7483@epa.ericsson.se>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f749a,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gidf749a,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public
X-Google-Thread: 10238b,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gid10238b,public
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public
X-Google-Thread: 147b40,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gid147b40,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c0a,public
X-Google-Thread: 109f11,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public
From: Tetsuya Nagae <nagaesan@fsinet.or.jp>
Subject: Re: Best Recordable Port'MD Player?
Date: 1997/01/14
Message-ID: <32DAF217.2D30@fsinet.or.jp>
X-Deja-AN: 209729262
references: <Pine.OSF.3.91.970110151227.22197G-100000@godiva> <32d8399a.2908168@news.uwa.edu.au> <32DB00BC.15FB7483@epa.ericsson.se>
content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
organization: DENON/Nippon Columbia Co.,Ltd.Japan Active Media
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.opinion,no.audio,fj.rec.av,aus.hi-fi,red.audio.hight-end,rec.audio.tech
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.01I [ja] (Win95; I)