Article View: rec.audio.misc
Article #28Re: Best Recordable Port'MD Player?
From: Mike Glantz
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 00:00
28 lines
2601 bytes
2601 bytes
lucifersam wrote: > Wrong again by the 5 or 6 gen of md it will easily surpass both cd and > dat because of drastically improved techniques in the atrac chip > possibly implamenting mpeg II or mpeg III. Um, I happen to be a MD fan, but let's keep the facts straight. ATRAC is still a lossy, perceptual coding algorithm with audible generation losses. At what point they become audible depends on the person and the material. Tests have been reported that *nobody* can hear differences on the 2rd generation on *any* material. Beyond that, I would make no claims, and I would certainly not advocate MD where multi-generation lossless processing is a requirement (which is the case in much recording work, but not all). After several generations, CD and DAT are simply going to win, by definition. On the technical side, while some of the mpeg audio compression algorithms are quite similar to ATRAC (and PASC used in DCC), they aren't identical. ATRAC is a Sony original, and not compatible with any of the mpeg algorithms. > Check out this web page for more info on MD------- > http://www.connact.com/~eaw/minidisc.html Indeed the minidisc page maintained by Eric Woudenberg and others is an excellent source of MD info, particularly if one is looking for facts and has an open mind.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32DDFC94.7183@grenoble.rxrc.xerox.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.OSF.3.91.970110151227.22197G-100000@godiva> <32d8399a.2908168@news.uwa.edu.au> <32d8866d.86394698@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <32dadd06.6281113@news.uwa.edu.au> <32DCFA98.7038@grenoble.rxrc.xerox.com> <32dd7783.4147936@news.uwa.edu.au> <32dde765.44165444@nntp.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f749a,4a56868ab364f8db X-Google-Attributes: gidf749a,public X-Google-Thread: 109f11,4a56868ab364f8db X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,4a56868ab364f8db X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,4a56868ab364f8db X-Google-Attributes: gid108c0a,public X-Google-Thread: 10238b,4a56868ab364f8db X-Google-Attributes: gid10238b,public X-Google-Thread: 147b40,4a56868ab364f8db X-Google-Attributes: gid147b40,public From: Mike Glantz <mike.glantz@grenoble.rxrc.xerox.com> Subject: Re: Best Recordable Port'MD Player? Date: 1997/01/16 Message-ID: <32DDFC94.7183@grenoble.rxrc.xerox.com> X-Deja-AN: 210185517 references: <Pine.OSF.3.91.970110151227.22197G-100000@godiva> <32d8399a.2908168@news.uwa.edu.au> <32d8866d.86394698@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <32dadd06.6281113@news.uwa.edu.au> <32DCFA98.7038@grenoble.rxrc.xerox.com> <32dd7783.4147936@news.uwa.edu.au> <32dde765.44165444@nntp.ix.netcom.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Rank Xerox Research Centre mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: mike.glantz@grenoble.rxrc.xerox.com newsgroups: rec.audio.misc,no.audio,fj.rec.av,aus.hi-fi,red.audio.hight-end,rec.audio.tech x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (WinNT; I)