🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <C0BF517E.30E38%soundhaspriority@fe03.buzzardnews.com>,
 "soundhaspriority@yahoo.com" <soundhaspriority@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "LeepinCat" <nulladdress123@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I DID search the group for previous threads but didn't readily find
> > an answer
> > without wading through a lot of rhetoric. But in your responses, the
> > differences
> > of opinion were very enlightening.
> > 
> >   The, lofty, pretentious, "Chevdo's" demeaning response generated some
> > helpful opinions. IMO, he should start his OWN, moderated, pro group.
> > Then he could pick and choose, who is worthy of his time, and infinite
> > wisdom, and avoid being bothered by the learning curve that most people
> > experience
> > regardless of the subject of conversation.  Maybe, "rec.audio.pro.
> > jackass" ?
> 
> Chevdo is one of the worst "pros" on this group for getting a reasonable
> answer.  What is a "pro", anyway?  I've now been recording my project for
> several weeks, and am feeling pretty professional about it.  No one here
> would help me, and I still managed to figure out what equipment I needed and
> how to hook it up, thanks to the good people at J&R Music World.  They've
> turned out to be the most helpful of any of the so-called "pro audio"
> companies, and I've got lots of gear now so I guess that makes me a "pro",
> too.
> 
> So if you just keep hammering these guys, you'll eventually get an answer
> that makes some sense.
> 
> Luv,
> Bob Morein

You could claim to be a pro if you own/use pro gear, I suppose, but the
U.S. government defines a professional as one who earns at least $1000
in a given line of employment...or at least that was the figure some
years back. I've been out of the country and back this decade, so I'm
not up to speed on current laws and whatnot.

Roll tape,
Eric