🚀 go-pugleaf

Apparently there are at least enough problems that they have chosen 
not to support that configuration.
Non support does not mean it will not work.
In fact many users successfully use various products in nonsupported 
configurations.

The bottom line is if you have problems and you are in a non supported 
path, they can quickly refuse you support so their resources can be 
directed to those with supported configurations.
Non supported is not the same as will not work properly.

-- 
Jupiter Jones  [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar



"Doc" <docsavage20@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:cf6ed3ec-e011-48ee-ad83-90e4d21d5d9d@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>I had a question about my M-Audio Audiophile 2496. It's running under
> XP Media Center. M-Audio replied that they don't support any of 
> their
> hardware with this O/S.
>
> The card works like a champ as far as I can tell. Their response is
> "this doesn't mean you won't experience full functionality but we
> don't support it".
>
> ??
>
> Do they know whether their card works with this O/S or don't they?
> Can someone clarify what the rationale behind this is?  Is there
> something fundamentally different about the way XP MCE is designed
> that it's wholly unlike other versions of XP and just happens to 
> have
> the same look as the other versions?
>
> Anyone experience weird problems with XP MCE that other versions 
> don't
> cause? Everything I've ever run on it runs fine, including older
> versions of things that aren't certified for it such as Soundforge 5
> and Cakewalk Pro Audio 8.