Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1039Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ?
From: mikewjones
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00
46 lines
3211 bytes
3211 bytes
In article <43Bm2.1585$Ge3.8385363@news.itd.umich.edu>, "Adam Fuller" <adamf@engin.umich.edu> wrote: > I really have no good use for a digital recording format of any kind > other than as a conversation piece or occasional experimental tool. Funny that. It's not as if I was aware of any great need for such a device in my life either (it was a Christmas present), but now, after a couple of weeks of shuffling, titling, splitting and combining, I look at the teetering pile of assorted ferrics and chromes next to my Nak (all labelled something helpful like "Radio 3, March '97") and wonder how I coped at all. > See, that's what I don't understand. My CD player is extremely modest (Sony > CDP-XA1ES, MSRP $350 USD, paid $200 used) and the MDS-JE510 has a 20-bit > ADAC Well, in that case, I guess you're in a better position than I to make an assessment of ATRAC's failings (better MD unit, theoretically inferior CD source). Thing is, whenever I compare an MD copy to the original I'm reminded of the shortcomings of my Goodmans CD portable; the Sharp is better but has traces of that same flatness and lack of life. Which I suppose is why I have difficulty putting it down to the ATRAC system - I automatically associate it with the fact that I'm listening to a 'mere' portable. > sizzling cymbals, brittle mids, esp. on vocals, and a general graininess in > the material. After what I would euphemistically describe as an 'uneven' rendering of Arvo Part's 'Tabula Rasa' last night, I may be coming round to your point of view. Looks like the honeymoon might be over... > On the other hand, MD quality murders any tape I have ever > heard, even when made and played back on the Dolby S deck I also used to > own. ... but the marriage has good prospects. > MP3 is extremely good for it's compression abilities. I find well done MP3s > almost indistinguishable from CD material. I really must start using my PC for things other than e-mail ;) Mike. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<77ffa7$n6j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <369A4971.D050DBD3@usa.net> <KEsm2.1521$Ge3.8055877@news.itd.umich.edu> <369A8E31.D11C02CE@mcmail.com> <43Bm2.1585$Ge3.8385363@news.itd.umich.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109f11,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public From: mikewjones@mcmail.com Subject: Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ? Date: 1999/01/12 Message-ID: <77ffa7$n6j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Deja-AN: 431619563 References: <77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <369A4971.D050DBD3@usa.net> <KEsm2.1521$Ge3.8055877@news.itd.umich.edu> <369A8E31.D11C02CE@mcmail.com> <43Bm2.1585$Ge3.8385363@news.itd.umich.edu> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x9.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 196.3.50.241 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Jan 12 12:31:02 1999 GMT Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.05 [en] (WinNT; I)