Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1080Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
From: Chung
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:00
9 lines
1572 bytes
1572 bytes
>who's to say the book in itself is corect? otherwise why would people >bother with 96khz or hdcd and all that? > >kent Good point...!!! Kent........I belive my ear more than the theory. I Hate argue with them. They belive theory more than ear. Chung
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<367f4153.21340362@news2.cyberec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net> <d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk> <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net> <F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com> <367C3063.31B20018@tdv.aus.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public From: kclee@hk.gin.net (Chung) Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ???? Date: 1998/12/22 Message-ID: <367f4153.21340362@news2.cyberec.com> X-Deja-AN: 424753906 References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net> <d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk> <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net> <F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com> <367C3063.31B20018@tdv.aus.org> X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@remarQ.com X-Trace: 914309471 JLODNAOICFC81CA3CC usenet58.supernews.com Organization: Posted via RemarQ, http://www.remarQ.com - Discussions start here! Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile