Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1079Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
From: Arny Kr�ger
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 00:00
41 lines
2848 bytes
2848 bytes
Lee HC wrote in message <01be2e67$86956740$LocalHost@default>... > > >John Woodgate <jmw@jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote in article ><s+C3BBAV7Ag2EwGz@jmwa.demon.co.uk>... >> In a most apposite and timely article <01be2daf$fced7620$LocalHost@defa >> ult>, Lee HC <leehc@glink.net.hk> contributes to the sum of human >> endeavour >> > >> >Arny Kr�ger <arnyk@flash.net> wrote in article >> >> >> >> It's worse than that! All good CD players sound the same! >> > >> >Arny, are you joking ? >> >> No, of course not. He's just *defined* a 'good' CD player as 'one that >> sounds the same as some others that I regard as good. > >John, > >I would agree if Arny mentioned: >1. All "ideal" CD players sound the same! or They have to. >2. All "good" CD player sound the "similar" as good. If you define "good" as "free of audible distortion and noise", then this would have to be true, right? >Then the question are: >1. Any possibility of "ideal" CD players? No. >2. How to ensure an "ideal" CD players performed ideally in domestic setting. Then, who need "ideal" CD players? Nobody. All we need is CD players that are free of audible distortion and noise. They already exist and have existed for well over a decade.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<o8jg2.640$ok1.1540@news.flash.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk><F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net><d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk><1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net><F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com><9AC33C397E6F7EEC.EB514CB227F8BAFB.F49C9B9A4FBF795C@library-proxy.airnews.net><z1ef2.322$S7.782@news.flash.net> <01be2daf$fced7620$LocalHost@default> <s+C3BBAV7Ag2EwGz@jmwa.demon.co.uk> <01be2e67$86956740$LocalHost@default>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public From: "Arny Kr�ger" <arnyk@flash.net> Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ???? Date: 1998/12/24 Message-ID: <o8jg2.640$ok1.1540@news.flash.net> X-Deja-AN: 425404683 References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk><F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net><d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk><1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net><F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com><9AC33C397E6F7EEC.EB514CB227F8BAFB.F49C9B9A4FBF795C@library-proxy.airnews.net><z1ef2.322$S7.782@news.flash.net> <01be2daf$fced7620$LocalHost@default> <s+C3BBAV7Ag2EwGz@jmwa.demon.co.uk> <01be2e67$86956740$LocalHost@default> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@flash.net X-Trace: news.flash.net 914472596 208.194.218.223 (Wed, 23 Dec 1998 22:09:56 CDT) Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 22:09:56 CDT Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile