Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1097Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
From: Arny Kr�ger
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:00
39 lines
2810 bytes
2810 bytes
Bob Velkov wrote in message ... >"Arny Kr�ger" <arnyk@flash.net> writes: > >> Felix M.C. Li wrote in message <754i43$m7s$1@unix2.glink.net.hk>... >> >Kit-pui Wong wrote: >> >> >> >> Some people with "golden ears" claim that there are great >> >> differences between an original CD and its digital CDR copy. >> >> >> > >> >I haven't heard anybody here claimed themselves to have a pair of >> >"Golden ears". And it doesn't need a "Golden ear" to hear it. >> > >> >Many cheap CD Recorders cannot make a good copy of the original, I >> >know my Ricoh is not good in doing so. I've heard some from Plextor >> >and they are much better than the ones from my Ricoh. Some people >> >said Yamaha is also very good. >> > >> >> >> I have a Plexstor 32 spin reader and a Plexstor 4x8 writer, and they are >> capable of making bit-exact copies. I do it routinely. >> >> I also have a Mitsumi 2x8 writer, and it makes exact copies of the audio discs >> it writes. Reading? a different matter... > >Yes, almost each one writer produces a real good copy. The hard and real >important work is done on the reading side. Plextor drives (except the 6x, >but all other, i.e. 12x, 12/20x, 32x) prodece bit-by-bit exact reads each >time. There are recently some other newer IDE CD-ROM drives that reads >audio good (the problem is the missing filesystem) but I only have heard >of such, no personal experience. > I've tested some of those new IDE drives, and while they are greatly improved, I'm not ditching my Plexstor for them!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<tRMe2.2724$IO1.3795@news.flash.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <754i43$m7s$1@unix2.glink.net.hk> <CMqd2.2712$Bc5.6048@news.flash.net> <xaj90g4ensl.fsf@par.univie.ac.at>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public From: "Arny Kr�ger" <arnyk@flash.net> Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ???? Date: 1998/12/19 Message-ID: <tRMe2.2724$IO1.3795@news.flash.net> X-Deja-AN: 423916847 References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <754i43$m7s$1@unix2.glink.net.hk> <CMqd2.2712$Bc5.6048@news.flash.net> <xaj90g4ensl.fsf@par.univie.ac.at> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@flash.net X-Trace: news.flash.net 914069977 208.194.215.21 (Sat, 19 Dec 1998 06:19:37 CDT) Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 06:19:37 CDT Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile