🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1097

Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????

#1097
From: Arny Kr�ger
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:00
39 lines
2810 bytes
Bob Velkov wrote in message ...
>"Arny Kr�ger" <arnyk@flash.net> writes:
>
>> Felix M.C. Li wrote in message <754i43$m7s$1@unix2.glink.net.hk>...
>> >Kit-pui Wong wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Some people with "golden ears" claim that there are great
>> >> differences between an original CD and its digital CDR copy.
>> >>
>> >
>> >I haven't heard anybody here claimed themselves to have a pair of
>> >"Golden ears". And it doesn't need a "Golden ear" to hear it.
>> >
>> >Many cheap CD Recorders cannot make a good copy of the original, I
>> >know my Ricoh is not good in doing so. I've heard some from Plextor
>> >and they are much better than the ones from my Ricoh. Some people
>> >said Yamaha is also very good.
>> >
>>
>>
>> I have a Plexstor 32 spin reader and a Plexstor 4x8 writer, and they are
>> capable of making bit-exact copies. I do it routinely.
>>
>> I also have a Mitsumi 2x8 writer, and it makes exact copies of the audio
discs
>> it writes. Reading? a different matter...
>
>Yes, almost each one writer produces a real good copy. The hard and real
>important work is done on the reading side. Plextor drives (except the 6x,
>but all other, i.e. 12x, 12/20x, 32x) prodece bit-by-bit exact reads each
>time. There are recently some other newer IDE CD-ROM drives that reads
>audio good (the problem is the missing filesystem) but I only have heard
>of such, no personal experience.
>


I've tested some of those new IDE drives, and while they are greatly improved,
I'm not ditching my Plexstor for them!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <tRMe2.2724$IO1.3795@news.flash.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <754i43$m7s$1@unix2.glink.net.hk> <CMqd2.2712$Bc5.6048@news.flash.net> <xaj90g4ensl.fsf@par.univie.ac.at>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public
X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public
X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public
From: "Arny Kr�ger" <arnyk@flash.net>
Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
Date: 1998/12/19
Message-ID: <tRMe2.2724$IO1.3795@news.flash.net>
X-Deja-AN: 423916847
References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <754i43$m7s$1@unix2.glink.net.hk> <CMqd2.2712$Bc5.6048@news.flash.net> <xaj90g4ensl.fsf@par.univie.ac.at>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
X-Complaints-To: abuse@flash.net
X-Trace: news.flash.net 914069977 208.194.215.21 (Sat, 19 Dec 1998 06:19:37 CDT)
Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 06:19:37 CDT
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile