Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1098Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
From: Richard D Pierce
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:00
59 lines
3567 bytes
3567 bytes
In article <9AC33C397E6F7EEC.EB514CB227F8BAFB.F49C9B9A4FBF795C@library-proxy.airnews.net>, Chung <kclee@hk.gin.net> wrote: >Yap, I don't know any Theory and Technique of CD format. Thankyou for >your correction. What I thinking in logical way only. How is ignoring the facts logical? >But if the >error correction is 100%, all transport could read 100% correct, mean >all transport sound same!!. Bot if the transports show iming, not data errors, and not if the DAC clock is tightly coupled to those timing errors (a sign of a poorly designed DAC). > So, why need expansive transport??? If the issue is to extract data without errors, in fact, many less expensive transports do it better then some expensive ones. So, no, to extract data error free, you do NOT need and expensive transport. >and why the supporting pin under transport affect sound??? Does it? You assume it does but wht proof is there that it sounds different? > Also, why different CD material/coating give different sound??? Does it? You assume it does but what proof is there that it sounds different? YOU claimed that audio CD transports do not have error correction. you did't say anything about sound, you said audio CD transports do not have error correction. That statement, all by itself, is just plain wrong. I challenge you to show us signle audio CD transport thhat does not do error correction. The CD CANNOT BE READ without pplying error correction because the error correction daa is embedded in the data stream and ALL CD players MUST apply the error correction to get the data, or the will get NO data, wether there are errors or not. YOUR claim was that audio CD transports do not have error correction. YOUR claim is WRONG. It's that simple. Now, if you want to start asking questions like hy does this or that make a difference, that's a different set of questions altogether. And if you want to make claims that different colors or differnt "pins" sound different, well, that's YOUR claim, and YOU need to provide some credible support that it does. We have already seen how credible one of your claims is. Remember, the one where you claimed that audio CD transports have no error correction? You know, the claim that was wrong? -- | Dick Pierce | | Professional Audio Development | | 1-781/826-4953 Voice and FAX | | DPierce@world.std.com |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<F47pMo.DrM@world.std.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net> <F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com> <9AC33C397E6F7EEC.EB514CB227F8BAFB.F49C9B9A4FBF795C@library-proxy.airnews.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public From: DPierce@world.std.com (Richard D Pierce) Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ???? Date: 1998/12/19 Message-ID: <F47pMo.DrM@world.std.com> X-Deja-AN: 423919854 References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net> <F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com> <9AC33C397E6F7EEC.EB514CB227F8BAFB.F49C9B9A4FBF795C@library-proxy.airnews.net> Organization: Professional Audio/Transducer Design Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile